RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

neka-nat/freecad-mcp

Default branch main · commit dbeefa7a · scanned 5/27/2026, 10:14:00 AM

GitHub: 1,022 stars · 166 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface neka-nat/freecad-mcp, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening statement to clarify 'MCP' and AI control

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository is a FreeCAD MCP that allows you to control FreeCAD from Claude Desktop.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is a FreeCAD MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that enables AI assistants, specifically Claude Desktop, to control FreeCAD using natural language prompts for automated CAD design.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add broader, more descriptive topics for AI-CAD integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude, freecad, mcp
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude, freecad, mcp, cad-automation, ai-integration, natural-language-processing, cad-control, generative-design
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://mseep.ai/app/neka-nat-freecad-mcp

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface neka-nat/freecad-mcp
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Rhino
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Rhino · recommended 2×
  2. Grasshopper · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  4. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  5. Fusion 360 · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate an AI assistant to control my CAD modeling software?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rhino
    2. Grasshopper
    3. OpenAI API
    4. ChatGPT
    5. Fusion 360
    6. Fusion 360 API
    7. AutoCAD
    8. AutoLISP
    9. VBA
    10. Python
    11. SolidWorks
    12. SolidWorks API
    13. Blender
    14. Blender Python API
    15. Onshape
    16. Onshape API
    17. GPT-4

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named neka-nat/freecad-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for automating CAD design tasks using natural language prompts from an AI.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Fusion 360
    2. Fusion 360 API
    3. OpenAI GPT-4
    4. ChatGPT
    5. OpenAI API
    6. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    7. SolidWorks
    8. SolidWorks API
    9. Rhino
    10. Grasshopper
    11. Onshape
    12. Onshape API
    13. AutoCAD
    14. AutoCAD API
    15. AutoLISP
    16. VBA
    17. .NET

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named neka-nat/freecad-mcp. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of neka-nat/freecad-mcp?
    pass
    AI named neka-nat/freecad-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts neka-nat/freecad-mcp in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named neka-nat/freecad-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo neka-nat/freecad-mcp solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named neka-nat/freecad-mcp explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of neka-nat/freecad-mcp. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/neka-nat/freecad-mcp.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/neka-nat/freecad-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/neka-nat/freecad-mcp"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/neka-nat/freecad-mcp.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

neka-nat/freecad-mcp — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite