RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j

Default branch main · commit dbc01ba7 · scanned 6/14/2026, 12:46:41 PM

GitHub: 961 stars · 251 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update Repository Description for Clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Neo4j Labs Model Context Protocol servers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Neo4j Labs servers implementing the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for LLM-graph database interaction.
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README H1 to Specify LLM-Graph Purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Neo4j Labs MCP Servers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Neo4j Labs Model Context Protocol (MCP) Servers for LLM-Graph Interaction
  • mediumtopics#3
    Enhance Topics for LLM-Graph Integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    database, mcp, mcp-server, neo4j, stdio
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    database, mcp, mcp-server, neo4j, stdio, llm, large-language-models, graph-ai, ai-integration, context-management, genai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. Neo4j AuraDS · recommended 1×
  4. Neo4j Graph Data Science Library (GDS) · recommended 1×
  5. GraphRAG · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools allow large language models to interact with graph data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Neo4j AuraDS
    4. Neo4j Graph Data Science Library (GDS)
    5. GraphRAG
    6. Amazon Neptune ML
    7. ArangoDB Oasis
    8. ArangoDB
    9. DGL (Deep Graph Library)
    10. PyTorch Geometric (PyG)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a protocol for AI assistant integration with graph database context management.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenCypher
    2. Gremlin
    3. Neo4j
    4. Memgraph
    5. Cypher for Apache TinkerPop
    6. Apache TinkerPop
    7. Amazon Neptune
    8. DataStax Astra DB Graph
    9. Bolt
    10. WebSocket
    11. FastAPI
    12. Node.js Express
    13. Spring Boot
    14. GraphQL
    15. Apollo Server
    16. Hasura
    17. Neo4j GraphQL Library
    18. RESTful API
    19. RDF
    20. SPARQL
    21. Apache Jena
    22. Virtuoso
    23. Stardog
    24. Neo4j Driver
    25. Apache TinkerPop Gremlin-Python
    26. Gremlin-Java

    AI recommended 26 alternatives but never named neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j?
    pass
    AI named neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

neo4j-contrib/mcp-neo4j — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite