RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ngxson/wllama

Default branch master · commit 766d28e0 · scanned 6/22/2026, 10:07:09 AM

GitHub: 1,124 stars · 99 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ngxson/wllama, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening sentence to highlight core value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # wllama - Wasm binding for llama.cpp
    
    WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # wllama: Run Llama 2, Multimodal, and Tool-Calling LLMs Directly in Your Web Browser with WebAssembly & WebGPU
    
    wllama provides a high-performance WebAssembly binding for llama.cpp, enabling client-side inference of large language models, including multimodal and tool-calling capabilities, directly in the browser.
  • hightopics#2
    Expand topics with user-centric keywords for browser-based LLMs and features

    Why:

    CURRENT
    llama, llamacpp, llm, wasm, webassembly
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llama, llamacpp, llm, wasm, webassembly, browser-llm, web-llm, client-side-llm, webgpu, multimodal-ai, tool-calling, javascript, typescript, gguf
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to clarify differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Comparison with Alternatives' or 'Why wllama?' in the README. This section should briefly highlight wllama's unique focus on llama.cpp's GGUF format, direct WebGPU/WebAssembly execution, and built-in multimodal/tool-calling support, contrasting it with broader frameworks or API clients.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ngxson/wllama
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
huggingface/transformers.js
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. huggingface/transformers.js · recommended 1×
  2. mlc-ai/web-llm · recommended 1×
  3. microsoft/onnxruntime-web · recommended 1×
  4. tensorflow/tfjs · recommended 1×
  5. pyodide/pyodide · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to run large language models directly in the browser using WebAssembly?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Transformers.js (huggingface/transformers.js)
    2. Web LLM (mlc-ai/web-llm)
    3. ONNX Runtime Web (microsoft/onnxruntime-web)
    4. TensorFlow.js (tensorflow/tfjs)
    5. Pyodide (pyodide/pyodide)
    6. WasmEdge (WasmEdge/WasmEdge)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ngxson/wllama. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a library to integrate multimodal LLMs with tool calling into web apps.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain.js (langchain-ai/langchainjs)
    2. LlamaIndex.TS (run-llama/LlamaIndexTS)
    3. OpenAI JavaScript SDK (openai/openai-node)
    4. Google AI JavaScript SDK (google/generative-ai-js)
    5. Hugging Face Transformers.js (xenova/transformers.js)
    6. Axios (axios/axios)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named ngxson/wllama. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ngxson/wllama?
    pass
    AI did not name ngxson/wllama — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ngxson/wllama in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ngxson/wllama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ngxson/wllama solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named ngxson/wllama explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ngxson/wllama. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ngxson/wllama.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ngxson/wllama)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ngxson/wllama"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ngxson/wllama.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ngxson/wllama — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite