RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

nlweb-ai/NLWeb

Default branch main · commit ac490c5f · scanned 5/13/2026, 4:32:13 AM

GitHub: 6,208 stars · 693 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nlweb-ai/NLWeb, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["natural-language-processing", "conversational-ai", "web-development", "ai-agents", "schema-org", "semantic-web", "python"]
  • highabout#2
    Update repository description for clarity and AI understanding

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Main reference implementation for NLWeb, implemented in Python.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Build conversational interfaces for websites using natural language APIs and Schema.org, enabling AI agent interaction.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Your project's official homepage URL]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface nlweb-ai/NLWeb
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Apache Jena
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Apache Jena · recommended 1×
  2. Fuseki · recommended 1×
  3. SPARQL · recommended 1×
  4. GraphDB · recommended 1×
  5. Stardog · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build natural language interfaces for websites using semantic web data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Jena
    2. Fuseki
    3. SPARQL
    4. GraphDB
    5. Stardog
    6. RDF4J
    7. Haystack
    8. Rasa
    9. Neo4j
    10. Neosemantics

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named nlweb-ai/NLWeb. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help create web APIs for both human and AI agent interaction?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FastAPI
    2. Django REST Framework (DRF)
    3. Flask
    4. Flask-RESTful
    5. Flask-Smorest
    6. Express.js
    7. swagger-jsdoc
    8. swagger-ui-express
    9. Spring Boot
    10. Springfox
    11. OpenAPI Generator
    12. ASP.NET Core Web API
    13. Swashbuckle.AspNetCore
    14. Gin
    15. Echo
    16. swag
    17. go-swagger

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named nlweb-ai/NLWeb. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nlweb-ai/NLWeb?
    pass
    AI named nlweb-ai/NLWeb explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts nlweb-ai/NLWeb in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named nlweb-ai/NLWeb explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo nlweb-ai/NLWeb solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named nlweb-ai/NLWeb explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of nlweb-ai/NLWeb. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/nlweb-ai/NLWeb.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlweb-ai/NLWeb)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlweb-ai/NLWeb"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nlweb-ai/NLWeb.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

nlweb-ai/NLWeb — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite