RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

nottelabs/notte

Default branch main · commit c7e1675e · scanned 5/28/2026, 2:12:50 PM

GitHub: 1,965 stars · 182 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nottelabs/notte, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to explicitly state project identity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Rapidly build reliable web automation agents
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Notte: The AI Web Agent Framework for Serverless Web Automation
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific topics for serverless, headless browser, and web scraping

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, ai, anthropic, automation, browser, llm, openai, web
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, ai, anthropic, automation, browser, llm, openai, web, serverless, headless-browser, web-scraping, data-extraction
  • lowlicense#3
    Clarify the existing license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This project is licensed under the terms specified in the LICENSE file.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface nottelabs/notte
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
run-llama/llama_index
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 2×
  2. SeleniumHQ/selenium · recommended 2×
  3. microsoft/playwright · recommended 1×
  4. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  5. AWS Lambda · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build and deploy AI-powered web automation agents quickly and reliably?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    4. AWS Lambda
    5. Google Cloud Run
    6. Azure Container Instances
    7. EC2/VM instance
    8. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    9. LangChain.js (langchain-ai/langchainjs)
    10. LlamaIndex.js (run-llama/llama_index)
    11. Vercel
    12. Netlify Functions
    13. Google Cloud Functions
    14. Heroku
    15. Selenium (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    16. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    17. Robocorp
    18. Robocorp Control Room
    19. OpenAI
    20. Anthropic
    21. Browserless.io
    22. Apify

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named nottelabs/notte. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for running serverless web automation with robust browser control?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright
    2. Puppeteer

    AI recommended 2 alternatives but never named nottelabs/notte. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nottelabs/notte?
    pass
    AI named nottelabs/notte explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts nottelabs/notte in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named nottelabs/notte explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo nottelabs/notte solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named nottelabs/notte explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of nottelabs/notte. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/nottelabs/notte.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nottelabs/notte)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nottelabs/notte"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nottelabs/notte.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

nottelabs/notte — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite