RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

obeli-sk/obelisk

Default branch main · commit 5cfbc683 · scanned 6/2/2026, 3:05:54 PM

GitHub: 674 stars · 19 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface obeli-sk/obelisk, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening statement to prevent miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1><a href="https://obeli.sk">Obelisk</a></h1>

A deterministic workflow engine built on the WASM Component Model.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1><a href="https://obeli.sk">Obelisk: Durable & Deterministic Workflow Engine</a></h1>

Obelisk is a powerful, production-ready workflow engine built on the WASM Component Model, designed for resilient and replayable long-running background tasks and activity orchestration.
  • mediumabout#2
    Expand the 'About' description for better AI understanding

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Durable & Deterministic Workflow Engine
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Obelisk is a durable and deterministic workflow engine built in Rust, leveraging the WASM Component Model for resilient, replayable, and sandboxed execution of long-running tasks and activity orchestration.
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison with Alternatives

Obelisk differentiates itself from other workflow engines like Temporal, Cadence, or Apache Airflow by focusing on the WASM Component Model for sandboxed, deterministic, and highly portable execution. Our Rust-based runtime offers a lightweight footprint and strong type safety, making it ideal for scenarios requiring fine-grained control over execution environments and robust resilience without heavy dependencies.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface obeli-sk/obelisk
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Temporal
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Temporal · recommended 2×
  2. Cadence · recommended 2×
  3. Netflix Conductor · recommended 1×
  4. Apache Airflow · recommended 1×
  5. AWS Step Functions · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a durable and deterministic workflow engine for long-running background tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Temporal
    2. Cadence
    3. Netflix Conductor
    4. Apache Airflow
    5. AWS Step Functions
    6. Azure Logic Apps
    7. Microsoft Power Automate

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named obeli-sk/obelisk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best Rust-based workflow engines supporting WASM for resilient task orchestration?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Temporal
    2. Cadence
    3. Conductor
    4. Actix-web
    5. Tokio
    6. Durable Functions

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named obeli-sk/obelisk. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of obeli-sk/obelisk?
    pass
    AI named obeli-sk/obelisk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts obeli-sk/obelisk in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named obeli-sk/obelisk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo obeli-sk/obelisk solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named obeli-sk/obelisk explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of obeli-sk/obelisk. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/obeli-sk/obelisk.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/obeli-sk/obelisk)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/obeli-sk/obelisk"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/obeli-sk/obelisk.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

obeli-sk/obelisk — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite