RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

oficcejo/aiagents-stock

Default branch main · commit c27627b0 · scanned 5/14/2026, 11:57:24 AM

GitHub: 1,339 stars · 433 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface oficcejo/aiagents-stock, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clearly state its purpose for A-share stock analysis

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🤖 复合多AI智能体股票团队分析系统
- 初心：在股市摸爬滚打多年...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🤖 复合多AI智能体股票团队分析系统：A股投资分析与决策建议平台

本项目是一个复合多AI智能体股票团队分析盯盘系统，基于多个AI智能体模拟证券分析师团队分析过程，为大陆A股市场提供全方位的股票投资分析和决策建议。它支持游资龙虎榜跟踪、板块预警轮动、批量多线程分析及实时关键点位监测，并预留miniqmt接口支持量化交易，旨在真正实现AI辅助炒股。
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization and search relevance

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, stock-analysis, a-share, investment-recommendations, quantitative-trading, multi-agent-system, financial-ai, stock-monitoring, deepseek, llm-agents
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the root directory of the repository to clearly state the terms of use and distribution.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface oficcejo/aiagents-stock
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuantConnect
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuantConnect · recommended 1×
  2. iFLYTEK · recommended 1×
  3. Wind · recommended 1×
  4. East Money · recommended 1×
  5. Tencent · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-powered system to analyze A-share stocks and provide investment recommendations.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. QuantConnect
    2. iFLYTEK
    3. Wind
    4. East Money
    5. Tencent
    6. Alibaba
    7. Alpha Vantage

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named oficcejo/aiagents-stock. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get real-time stock market alerts and macro analysis for investment decisions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Bloomberg Terminal
    2. Refinitiv Eikon
    3. FactSet
    4. TradingView
    5. Seeking Alpha Premium
    6. The Wall Street Journal Digital Subscription
    7. Forex Factory

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named oficcejo/aiagents-stock. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of oficcejo/aiagents-stock?
    pass
    AI did not name oficcejo/aiagents-stock — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts oficcejo/aiagents-stock in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named oficcejo/aiagents-stock explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo oficcejo/aiagents-stock solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name oficcejo/aiagents-stock — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of oficcejo/aiagents-stock. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/oficcejo/aiagents-stock.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/oficcejo/aiagents-stock)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/oficcejo/aiagents-stock"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/oficcejo/aiagents-stock.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

oficcejo/aiagents-stock — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite