RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

oldwinter/knowledge-garden

Default branch main · commit 2ad252e3 · scanned 5/13/2026, 10:02:09 PM

GitHub: 2,433 stars · 138 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface oldwinter/knowledge-garden, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the core value proposition to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with metadata, then a personal H1, followed by navigation links.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following sentence immediately after the initial navigation links paragraph:
    `This repository is a comprehensive, open-source Obsidian template and personal knowledge management (PKM) system, designed as a "second brain" and "digital garden" for linked notes, evergreen notes, and spaced repetition.`
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the opening of the 'What is this' section for AI scanning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current '这是什么' section starts with `双链笔记的 [[最佳实践]]。完整快照了我每天使用 [[Obsidian|Obsidian]] 写的笔记、用的插件和工作流。`
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Modify the first sentence of the '这是什么' section to be more direct and keyword-rich for AI:
    `## 这是什么`
    `这是一个基于 Obsidian 的个人知识管理 (PKM) 系统和数字花园模板,旨在提供双链笔记、常青笔记和间隔重复的最佳实践。它完整快照了我每天使用 [[Obsidian|Obsidian]] 写的笔记、用的插件和工作流。`
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, for example, before '贡献与交流':
    `## 与其他工具的比较`
    `与 Obsidian、Logseq 或 Roam Research 等通用双链笔记工具不同,本库是一个开箱即用的 Obsidian 知识库模板,集成了我的个人工作流、插件配置和笔记组织方法(如 PARA、Zettelkasten)。它不是一个独立的软件,而是 Obsidian 用户的进阶实践指南和可复用系统。`

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface oldwinter/knowledge-garden
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. logseq/logseq · recommended 1×
  3. Roam Research · recommended 1×
  4. Notion · recommended 1×
  5. TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki5 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I effectively build a personal knowledge management system with linked notes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq (logseq/logseq)
    3. Roam Research
    4. Notion
    5. TiddlyWiki (TiddlyWiki/TiddlyWiki5)
    6. Joplin (laurent22/joplin)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named oldwinter/knowledge-garden. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good tools for creating a local-first, markdown-based knowledge base with spaced repetition?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. spaced repetition plugin
    3. Logseq
    4. Anki
    5. VS Code
    6. Anki-Editor
    7. Markdown to Anki
    8. Zettlr
    9. Joplin
    10. Flashcards plugin
    11. Foam

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named oldwinter/knowledge-garden. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of oldwinter/knowledge-garden?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts oldwinter/knowledge-garden in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo oldwinter/knowledge-garden solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of oldwinter/knowledge-garden. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/oldwinter/knowledge-garden.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/oldwinter/knowledge-garden)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/oldwinter/knowledge-garden"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/oldwinter/knowledge-garden.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

oldwinter/knowledge-garden — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite