RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

oldwinter/knowledge-garden

Default branch main · commit 2ad252e3 · scanned 6/24/2026, 8:57:02 AM

GitHub: 2,445 stars · 137 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface oldwinter/knowledge-garden, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise problem-solution statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The current README starts with an H1, then links, then a TIP, then '这是什么'.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    这是一个基于 Obsidian 构建的个人知识管理系统，旨在帮助你高效搭建和维护你的第二大脑与数字花园，通过双链笔记实现知识的组织、连接与检索。
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Update the repository homepage URL to the published garden

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://oldwinter.top
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://garden.oldwinter.top/README
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a concise '核心特性' (Core Features) section to the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The '这是什么' section is currently prose.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## 核心特性

- **Obsidian 双链笔记最佳实践**: 完整展示了日常使用 Obsidian 写作、管理笔记的经验、插件配置和工作流。
- **完整的个人第二大脑与数字花园系统**: 提供一个实时、开放的个人知识库，用于阅读、笔记与写作。
- **常青笔记理念**: 90% 的笔记为自用常青笔记，保留真实完备细节。
- **Web 发布支持**: 提供将笔记发布到 Web 的开源流程和指南。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface oldwinter/knowledge-garden
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 1×
  2. Logseq · recommended 1×
  3. Roam Research · recommended 1×
  4. Notion · recommended 1×
  5. Craft · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a system to manage personal knowledge and create a second brain.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq
    3. Roam Research
    4. Notion
    5. Craft
    6. TiddlyWiki

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named oldwinter/knowledge-garden. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for open-source solutions to publish linked markdown notes online.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian Publish
    2. Jekyll
    3. GitHub Pages
    4. Hugo
    5. Netlify
    6. Vercel
    7. MkDocs
    8. Gatsby
    9. React
    10. Docusaurus
    11. Zola

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named oldwinter/knowledge-garden. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of oldwinter/knowledge-garden?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts oldwinter/knowledge-garden in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo oldwinter/knowledge-garden solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named oldwinter/knowledge-garden explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of oldwinter/knowledge-garden. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/oldwinter/knowledge-garden.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/oldwinter/knowledge-garden)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/oldwinter/knowledge-garden"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/oldwinter/knowledge-garden.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

oldwinter/knowledge-garden — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite