RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

onnx/tutorials

Default branch main · commit 3a0d50a0 · scanned 5/8/2026, 11:33:30 PM

GitHub: 3,673 stars · 655 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface onnx/tutorials, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    onnx, machine-learning, deep-learning, model-conversion, model-deployment, tutorials, examples, how-to
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README opening to clarify purpose as practical guides

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) is an open standard format for representing machine learning models. ONNX is supported by a community of partners who have implemented it in many frameworks and tools.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides practical, hands-on tutorials and examples for working with the Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) format. Learn how to convert models from various machine learning frameworks to ONNX, and how to use ONNX models for deployment.
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage link to the ONNX website

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://onnx.ai/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface onnx/tutorials
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ONNX
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ONNX · recommended 1×
  2. MMdnn · recommended 1×
  3. TensorFlow SavedModel / Keras H5 · recommended 1×
  4. PyTorch JIT (TorchScript) · recommended 1×
  5. Core ML Tools · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to convert trained deep learning models between different machine learning frameworks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ONNX
    2. MMdnn
    3. TensorFlow SavedModel / Keras H5
    4. PyTorch JIT (TorchScript)
    5. Core ML Tools

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named onnx/tutorials. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best practices for standardizing machine learning model deployment across platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Docker
    2. Podman
    3. Kubernetes
    4. OpenShift
    5. Amazon ECS (Elastic Container Service)
    6. MLflow (MLflow Model Serving)
    7. TensorFlow Serving
    8. TorchServe
    9. KServe (formerly KFServing)
    10. GitHub Actions
    11. GitLab CI/CD
    12. Jenkins
    13. MLflow Model Registry
    14. Amazon SageMaker Model Registry

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named onnx/tutorials. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of onnx/tutorials?
    pass
    AI named onnx/tutorials explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts onnx/tutorials in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named onnx/tutorials explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo onnx/tutorials solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named onnx/tutorials explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of onnx/tutorials. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/onnx/tutorials.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/onnx/tutorials)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/onnx/tutorials"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/onnx/tutorials.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

onnx/tutorials — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite