RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

op7418/Humanizer-zh

Default branch main · commit 91f3d394 · scanned 5/31/2026, 5:13:33 PM

GitHub: 8,685 stars · 679 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface op7418/Humanizer-zh, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly differentiate from the .NET Humanizer library in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Humanizer-zh 是一个用于去除文本中 AI 生成痕迹的工具，帮助你将 AI 生成的内容改写得更自然、更像人类书写的文本。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Humanizer-zh 是一个专为 Claude Code 设计的技能，旨在去除文本中 AI 生成的痕迹，帮助你将 AI 生成的内容改写得更自然、更像人类书写的文本。请注意，本项目与流行的 .NET Humanizer 库（用于将数字、日期等转换为可读文本）无关。
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-skill, ai-humanizer, text-rewriting, ai-text-detection, chinese-language, llm-tool, content-humanization
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/op7418/Humanizer-zh

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface op7418/Humanizer-zh
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GPT-3.5 / GPT-4 (OpenAI)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GPT-3.5 / GPT-4 (OpenAI) · recommended 1×
  2. Claude (Anthropic) · recommended 1×
  3. Jasper.ai · recommended 1×
  4. Copy.ai · recommended 1×
  5. Grammarly (Premium/Business) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to make AI-generated text sound more natural and human-like?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GPT-3.5 / GPT-4 (OpenAI)
    2. Claude (Anthropic)
    3. Jasper.ai
    4. Copy.ai
    5. Grammarly (Premium/Business)
    6. Hemingway Editor

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named op7418/Humanizer-zh. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there tools to remove AI writing traces from content within an AI assistant?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Undetectable.ai
    2. Content at Scale (Humanizer)
    3. QuillBot (Paraphraser)
    4. Wordtune (Rewrite)
    5. Jasper (Brand Voice & Tone Adjustments)
    6. Copy.ai (Rewrite/Improve)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named op7418/Humanizer-zh. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of op7418/Humanizer-zh?
    pass
    AI named op7418/Humanizer-zh explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts op7418/Humanizer-zh in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named op7418/Humanizer-zh explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo op7418/Humanizer-zh solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name op7418/Humanizer-zh — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of op7418/Humanizer-zh. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/op7418/Humanizer-zh.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/op7418/Humanizer-zh)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/op7418/Humanizer-zh"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/op7418/Humanizer-zh.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

op7418/Humanizer-zh — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite