RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

open-thought/system-2-research

Default branch main · commit bad812a7 · scanned 6/16/2026, 2:58:02 AM

GitHub: 875 stars · 79 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface open-thought/system-2-research, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to emphasize its role as a curated research collection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Here you find a collection of material (books, papers, blog-posts etc.) related to reasoning and cognition in AI systems.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository serves as a curated, open-source knowledge base and collection of essential research materials (books, papers, blog posts, etc.) focused on System 2 reasoning and cognition in AI systems.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the repository URL as the homepage link

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/open-thought/system-2-research

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface open-thought/system-2-research
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ACT-R
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ACT-R · recommended 2×
  2. Jason · recommended 2×
  3. AgentSpeak · recommended 2×
  4. Cyc · recommended 1×
  5. OWL · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find academic resources on designing AI systems with deliberative reasoning capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cyc
    2. OWL
    3. Protégé
    4. HermiT
    5. FaCT++
    6. Prolog
    7. SOAR
    8. ACT-R
    9. CLARION
    10. PDDL
    11. FastForward
    12. FF
    13. Metric-FF
    14. LAMA
    15. Fast Downward
    16. LPG
    17. MIPS-XXL
    18. BDI Agents
    19. Jason
    20. AgentSpeak
    21. ASPIC+
    22. DeLP

    AI recommended 22 alternatives but never named open-thought/system-2-research. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the leading cognitive architectures for building intelligent agents that learn and adapt?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Soar
    2. ACT-R
    3. BDI Architectures
    4. Jason
    5. AgentSpeak
    6. OpenCog
    7. LIDA
    8. ICARUS

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named open-thought/system-2-research. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of open-thought/system-2-research?
    pass
    AI named open-thought/system-2-research explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts open-thought/system-2-research in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named open-thought/system-2-research explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo open-thought/system-2-research solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named open-thought/system-2-research explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of open-thought/system-2-research. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/open-thought/system-2-research.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-thought/system-2-research)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-thought/system-2-research"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/open-thought/system-2-research.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

open-thought/system-2-research — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite