RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

open-webui/docs

Default branch main · commit 8fc55ed4 · scanned 6/12/2026, 9:23:27 AM

GitHub: 764 stars · 582 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface open-webui/docs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the appropriate license text for Open WebUI.
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen README's opening to link documentation to product value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Welcome to the official documentation for **Open WebUI** — a self-hosted, privacy-focused, and extensible AI interface for LLMs like Ollama and OpenAI-compatible APIs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Welcome to the official documentation for **Open WebUI**, the leading self-hosted, privacy-focused, and extensible AI interface for LLMs like Ollama and OpenAI-compatible APIs. This documentation is essential for deploying and maximizing the value of Open WebUI.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    open-webui
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    open-webui, documentation, llm, ai, chat-interface, self-hosted, ollama, openai-api

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface open-webui/docs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LocalGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LocalGPT · recommended 1×
  2. PrivateGPT · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. LangChain · recommended 1×
  5. Ollama · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good options for a self-hosted local AI chat interface with RAG capabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LocalGPT
    2. PrivateGPT
    3. LlamaIndex
    4. LangChain
    5. Ollama

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named open-webui/docs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an extensible, privacy-focused web UI to interact with large language models via Docker.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Oobabooga's text-generation-webui (oobabooga/text-generation-webui)
    2. LM Studio
    3. LocalAI (go-skynet/LocalAI)
    4. Jan (janhq/jan)
    5. Open WebUI (open-webui/open-webui)
    6. PrivateGPT (imartinez/privateGPT)
    7. AnythingLLM (Mintplex-Labs/anythingllm)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named open-webui/docs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of open-webui/docs?
    pass
    AI named open-webui/docs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts open-webui/docs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named open-webui/docs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo open-webui/docs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name open-webui/docs — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of open-webui/docs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/open-webui/docs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-webui/docs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/open-webui/docs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/open-webui/docs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

open-webui/docs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite