RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openagents-org/openagents

Default branch develop · commit b116bd86 · scanned 6/24/2026, 1:26:40 AM

GitHub: 3,799 stars · 379 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openagents-org/openagents, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README opening to clarify core purpose and scope

    Why:

    CURRENT
    OpenAgents Workspace — The Collaborative OS for Agents. One workspace where all your AI agents collaborate. Open source. No account required.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    OpenAgents Workspace: The Collaborative Operating System for AI Agents. A unified, open-source platform for orchestrating and managing networks of AI agents, enabling seamless collaboration across both on-device and cloud environments. No account required.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics for better categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, collaboration, llm, network
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, collaboration, llm, network, orchestration, multi-agent, platform, workspace
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison to Alternatives
    
    While tools like LangChain and AutoGen provide powerful frameworks for building individual agents, OpenAgents Workspace focuses on providing a unified operating system for *orchestrating and managing networks* of these agents, enabling seamless *collaboration* between them in a single environment. Our emphasis is on the *workspace* for agent interaction and coordination, rather than just agent construction.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openagents-org/openagents
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  3. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  4. Haystack · recommended 1×
  5. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up a unified environment for multiple AI agents to collaborate effectively?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGen
    3. Haystack
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. CrewAI
    6. OpenAI Assistants API
    7. FastAPI
    8. Flask
    9. RabbitMQ
    10. Kafka

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named openagents-org/openagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools exist for orchestrating and managing a network of autonomous AI agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGPT
    3. CrewAI
    4. Microsoft AutoGen
    5. Haystack (deepset)
    6. LlamaIndex (formerly GPT Index)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named openagents-org/openagents. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openagents-org/openagents?
    pass
    AI did not name openagents-org/openagents — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openagents-org/openagents in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openagents-org/openagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openagents-org/openagents solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openagents-org/openagents explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openagents-org/openagents. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openagents-org/openagents.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openagents-org/openagents)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openagents-org/openagents"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openagents-org/openagents.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openagents-org/openagents — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite