RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments

Default branch master · commit bafaf1e1 · scanned 6/29/2026, 4:17:42 PM

GitHub: 1,807 stars · 325 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state its domain and purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Multiagent emergence environments
    Environment generation code for Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula (blog)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Multi-Agent Emergence Environments: Physics-Based Reinforcement Learning for Emergent Behavior Research
    This repository contains the environment generation code for physics-based multi-agent reinforcement learning experiments, specifically developed for the paper "Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula" (blog link). It provides customizable simulation environments to study complex emergent behaviors and tool use in AI agents.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL linking to the associated blog post

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [URL of the "Emergent Tool Use From Multi-Agent Autocurricula" blog post]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
projectmesa/mesa
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. projectmesa/mesa · recommended 1×
  2. NetLogo/NetLogo · recommended 1×
  3. gama-platform/gama · recommended 1×
  4. mason/mason · recommended 1×
  5. Anylogic · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to simulate complex multi-agent interactions for emergent behavior research in AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mesa (projectmesa/mesa)
    2. NetLogo (NetLogo/NetLogo)
    3. GAMA Platform (gama-platform/gama)
    4. MASON (mason/mason)
    5. Anylogic
    6. OpenSpiel (deepmind/open_spiel)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help create dynamic physics-based environments for multi-agent reinforcement learning experiments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Unity (Unity-Technologies/ml-agents)
    2. MuJoCo (google-deepmind/mujoco)
    3. Isaac Gym (NVIDIA-Omniverse/IsaacSim)
    4. PyBullet (bulletphysics/bullet3)
    5. Gazebo (osrf/gazebo)
    6. RoboSuite (ARISE-Initiative/robosuite)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments?
    pass
    AI did not name openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openai/multi-agent-emergence-environments — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite