RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

oriondesign2015/SetupOrion

Default branch main · commit b0f6d94e · scanned 6/5/2026, 1:52:05 PM

GitHub: 738 stars · 262 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface oriondesign2015/SetupOrion, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics related to marketing automation and server deployment

    Why:

    CURRENT
    open-source, setup, tools
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    open-source, setup, tools, marketing-automation, server-deployment, vps, linux-automation, auto-installer, digital-marketing
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a section listing the categories or examples of tools installed

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h3>🛠️ Ferramentas de Automação e Marketing Suportadas</h3><p>Este instalador permite a escolha e configuração de diversas ferramentas essenciais para marketing digital e automação, incluindo (mas não limitado a):</p><ul><li>Plataformas de Email Marketing e CRM</li><li>Ferramentas de Automação de Redes Sociais</li><li>Sistemas de Gerenciamento de Conteúdo (CMS)</li><li>Utilitários para Análise e Monitoramento</li></ul><p>Consulte a documentação interna para a lista completa de aplicações disponíveis.</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface oriondesign2015/SetupOrion
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mautic
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mautic · recommended 1×
  2. Cloudron · recommended 1×
  3. Sandstorm · recommended 1×
  4. Ghost · recommended 1×
  5. DigitalOcean · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quickly deploy open-source marketing and automation tools on a new server?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mautic
    2. Cloudron
    3. Sandstorm
    4. Ghost
    5. DigitalOcean
    6. WordPress
    7. MailPoet
    8. FluentCRM
    9. HubSpot
    10. Kinsta
    11. WP Engine
    12. SiteGround
    13. Matomo
    14. Softaculous
    15. OpenProject
    16. Flarum
    17. Baserow
    18. Airtable

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named oriondesign2015/SetupOrion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a script to automate installation of various open-source tools on a Linux VPS.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ansible
    2. Chef
    3. Puppet
    4. SaltStack
    5. Bash Scripts
    6. Cloud-init

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named oriondesign2015/SetupOrion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of oriondesign2015/SetupOrion?
    pass
    AI named oriondesign2015/SetupOrion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts oriondesign2015/SetupOrion in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named oriondesign2015/SetupOrion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo oriondesign2015/SetupOrion solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name oriondesign2015/SetupOrion — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of oriondesign2015/SetupOrion. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/oriondesign2015/SetupOrion.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/oriondesign2015/SetupOrion)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/oriondesign2015/SetupOrion"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/oriondesign2015/SetupOrion.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

oriondesign2015/SetupOrion — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite