RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

patil-suraj/question_generation

Default branch master · commit c30e2976 · scanned 6/21/2026, 9:17:33 PM

GitHub: 1,143 stars · 349 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface patil-suraj/question_generation, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening to clarify it's a ready-to-use QG library/tool

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the following text immediately after the H1 title in the README: "This repository provides a practical, ready-to-use library and fine-tuned models for neural question generation using 🤗transformers, enabling developers and researchers to easily integrate QG capabilities into their applications."
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Key Features' section to highlight differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled 'Key Features' or 'Why Use This Library?' after the initial positioning statement. List specific benefits like 'Supports answer-aware and end-to-end QG', 'Provides pre-trained models for various tasks', and 'Easy integration with the Hugging Face ecosystem'.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository settings

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository homepage URL in the GitHub repository settings to a relevant project page, documentation, or demo link (e.g., a Hugging Face Spaces demo or a dedicated project website).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface patil-suraj/question_generation
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  2. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  3. Google Cloud AI Platform · recommended 1×
  4. Amazon Comprehend · recommended 1×
  5. Amazon SageMaker · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically create questions from text content using natural language generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    3. Google Cloud AI Platform
    4. Amazon Comprehend
    5. Amazon SageMaker
    6. SpaCy
    7. NLTK

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named patil-suraj/question_generation. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a transformer-based solution to generate questions from input paragraphs.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers Library (huggingface/transformers)
    2. T5
    3. BART
    4. AllenNLP (allenai/allennlp)
    5. Fairseq (facebookresearch/fairseq)
    6. OpenNMT-py (OpenNMT/OpenNMT-py)
    7. SpaCy (explosion/spaCy)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named patil-suraj/question_generation. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of patil-suraj/question_generation?
    pass
    AI did not name patil-suraj/question_generation — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts patil-suraj/question_generation in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named patil-suraj/question_generation explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo patil-suraj/question_generation solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name patil-suraj/question_generation — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of patil-suraj/question_generation. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/patil-suraj/question_generation.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/patil-suraj/question_generation)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/patil-suraj/question_generation"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/patil-suraj/question_generation.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

patil-suraj/question_generation — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite