RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI

Default branch main · commit 8a935929 · scanned 6/3/2026, 2:26:42 AM

GitHub: 504 stars · 100 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
15 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
0 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Refine README's opening statement to emphasize 'self-hosted web UI'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Static website that allows you to use your OpenAI API key for the same experience as you get with ChatGPT!
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A lightweight, self-hosted web UI that lets you use your OpenAI API key for a ChatGPT-like experience, with no backend database required.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Key Differentiators' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Key Differentiators
- Lightweight, self-hosted web UI.
- No backend database required; all data (API keys, chat history, settings) stored client-side in local storage.
- Direct OpenAI API key usage for cost-effectiveness, often cheaper than ChatGPT Premium.
- Includes a usage calculator and token/cost saving features like sending messages without history or chat summarization.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenRouter.ai
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenRouter.ai · recommended 1×
  2. lobehub/lobe-chat · recommended 1×
  3. mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Playground · recommended 1×
  5. Poe (by Quora) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a free web interface to use my OpenAI API key like ChatGPT.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenRouter.ai
    2. LobeChat (lobehub/lobe-chat)
    3. Chatbot UI (mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui)
    4. OpenAI Playground
    5. Poe (by Quora)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are cost-effective alternatives to ChatGPT Plus for personal API key usage?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI's GPT-3.5 Turbo
    2. Anthropic's Claude 3 Haiku
    3. Google's Gemini 1.5 Flash
    4. Mistral AI's Mistral 7B Instruct
    5. Perplexity AI's pp/7b-online
    6. Cohere's Command R

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI?
    pass
    AI did not name patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

patrikzudel/PatrikZeros-ChatGPT-API-UI — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite