RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM

Default branch main · commit d814f851 · scanned 6/16/2026, 3:27:03 PM

GitHub: 632 stars · 49 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly state 'code generation' in the README's TL;DR

    Why:

    CURRENT
    👉 TL;DR: **Open-dLLM** is the most open release of a diffusion-based large language model to date — including **pretraining, evaluation, inference, and checkpoints**.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    👉 TL;DR: **Open-dLLM** is the most open release of a diffusion-based large language model for **code generation** to date — including **pretraining, evaluation, inference, and checkpoints**.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    diffusion-models, large-language-models
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    diffusion-models, large-language-models, code-generation, llm-finetuning, model-adaptation
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Key Differentiators' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section (e.g., 'Why Open-dLLM?' or 'Key Differentiators') to the README that explicitly compares Open-dLLM's approach (diffusion-based, representation alignment for speedup) to common alternatives for code generation (e.g., autoregressive LLMs like Copilot/Codex) and model adaptation frameworks (e.g., Hugging Face Diffusers).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. OpenAI Codex/GPT models · recommended 1×
  3. Google Bard · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  5. DiffCoder · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate code using a diffusion-based large language model?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. OpenAI Codex/GPT models
    3. Google Bard
    4. OpenAI ChatGPT
    5. DiffCoder
    6. CodeT5

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help adapt autoregressive language models to diffusion models for faster code generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers
    2. Diffusers
    3. PyTorch
    4. TensorFlow
    5. DeepSpeed
    6. Accelerate
    7. OpenAI Gym
    8. Weights & Biases (W&B)
    9. MLflow

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM?
    pass
    AI did not name pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

pengzhangzhi/Open-dLLM — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite