REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0
Default branch main · commit a5c30462 · scanned 5/25/2026, 8:08:07 PM
GitHub: 2,589 stars · 66 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- hightopics#1Add specific topics to improve categorization
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX["robotics", "foundation-model", "vla-model", "humanoid-robotics", "loco-manipulation", "dexterous-control", "few-shot-learning", "embodied-ai", "vision-language-action"]
- highreadme#2Strengthen the README's opening to emphasize "foundation model" and "humanoid loco-manipulation"
Why:
CURRENTThe current README starts with a strong H1 but then has a short description before diving into technical details.
COPY-PASTE FIXEnsure the first paragraph immediately after the H1 clearly states: "Ψ₀ is an open vision-language-action (VLA) foundation model specifically designed for dexterous humanoid loco-manipulation, enabling universal humanoid intelligence through large-scale human egocentric video pre-training and few-shot real-world fine-tuning."
- mediumlicense#3Clarify the existing license in the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXAdd a section or a clear statement in the README, e.g., "This project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) from LICENSE file, e.g., a custom research license combining elements of X and Y]. Please refer to the LICENSE file for full details."
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- OpenAI Gym · recommended 1×
- Farama Foundation Gymnasium · recommended 1×
- MuJoCo · recommended 1×
- NVIDIA Isaac Gym · recommended 1×
- DeepMind Control Suite · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat open foundation models exist for universal humanoid loco-manipulation and dexterous control?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- OpenAI Gym
- Farama Foundation Gymnasium
- MuJoCo
- NVIDIA Isaac Gym
- DeepMind Control Suite
- PyBullet
- ROS 2
- Gazebo
- RLlib
- Agility Robotics' Digit SDK
- Unitree Robotics' Go2/H1 SDKs
AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to train robot manipulation skills using large-scale human videos and few-shot fine-tuning?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Robotics Transformer (RT-1, RT-2)
- Open-X Embodied Datasets
- Diffusion Policy
- Perceiver IO
- Perceiver-Actor
- CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training)
- ViT (Vision Transformer)
- MAE (Masked Autoencoders)
- Kinetics-700
- Something-Something V2
- SlowFast
- MViT
- X3D
AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0?passAI named physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
physical-superintelligence-lab/Psi0 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite