RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4

Default branch main · commit 92529feb · scanned 5/26/2026, 10:47:42 AM

GitHub: 646 stars · 401 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Multi-role chain-of-thought LLM pipeline for Solidity smart contract security auditing, explaining findings, generating exploits, and suggesting fixes.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    The license for this project is detailed in the LICENSE file. Please refer to it for specific terms and conditions.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
crytic/slither
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. crytic/slither · recommended 1×
  2. ConsenSys/mythril · recommended 1×
  3. tintinweb/vscode-solidity-visual-auditor · recommended 1×
  4. crytic/echidna · recommended 1×
  5. foundry-rs/foundry · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to provide detailed explanations and exploit examples for Solidity smart contract security findings?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Slither (crytic/slither)
    2. Mythril (ConsenSys/mythril)
    3. Solidity Visual Auditor (SVA) (tintinweb/vscode-solidity-visual-auditor)
    4. Echidna (crytic/echidna)
    5. Foundry (foundry-rs/foundry)
    6. Truffle Security (now part of ConsenSys Diligence)
    7. OpenZeppelin Contracts (OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-driven assistant to help fix and explain vulnerabilities in Solidity smart contracts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Codex / GPT-4
    2. MythX
    3. Slither (trailofbits/slither)
    4. Certora Prover
    5. Forta
    6. SolidityScan

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4?
    pass
    AI named polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

polymarket-developers/mkzmbd4 — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite