RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter

Default branch master · commit e384af8f · scanned 6/5/2026, 6:43:03 AM

GitHub: 715 stars · 152 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify its unique auditing focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Privacy Meter is an open-source library to audit data privacy in a wide range of statistical and machine learning algorithms (classification, regression, computer vision, and natural language processing). The tool enables data protection impact assessment based on the state-of-the-art membership inference attacks.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Privacy Meter is an open-source library for **quantitatively auditing data privacy risks** in machine learning models. It specializes in **assessing information leakage** through state-of-the-art membership inference attacks, enabling **data protection impact assessment** across various ML algorithms (classification, regression, computer vision, NLP). Unlike differential privacy libraries or fairness tools, Privacy Meter provides the metrics and tools to *measure* and *evaluate* the privacy posture of your deployed models.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine repository topics for sharper focus on privacy auditing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    data-privacy, data-protection, data-protection-impact-assessment, explainable-ai, gdpr, inference, information-leakage, machine-learning, membership-inference-attack, privacy, privacy-audit
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    data-privacy, data-protection, data-protection-impact-assessment, gdpr, inference, information-leakage, machine-learning, membership-inference-attack, privacy, privacy-audit, privacy-risk-assessment, ml-privacy

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
IBM AI Fairness 360 (AIF360)
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. IBM AI Fairness 360 (AIF360) · recommended 1×
  2. Google's Differential Privacy Library (TensorFlow Privacy / JAX Privacy) · recommended 1×
  3. Microsoft's SmartNoise (OpenDP) · recommended 1×
  4. ARX Data Anonymization Tool · recommended 1×
  5. Pytorch Opacus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to quantitatively assess data privacy risks in deployed machine learning models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IBM AI Fairness 360 (AIF360)
    2. Google's Differential Privacy Library (TensorFlow Privacy / JAX Privacy)
    3. Microsoft's SmartNoise (OpenDP)
    4. ARX Data Anonymization Tool
    5. Pytorch Opacus
    6. CleverHans
    7. PySyft
    8. TenSEAL

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for evaluating information leakage and data protection impact in AI systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IBM AI Explainability 360 (AIX360) (IBM/AIX360)
    2. Google Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) API
    3. Microsoft Azure Confidential Computing
    4. OpenMined PySyft (OpenMined/PySyft)
    5. Fiddler AI Observability Platform
    6. Privitar Nova
    7. OWASP AI Exchange (AIX) (OWASP/AI-Exchange)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter?
    pass
    AI named privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite