RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

protectai/vulnhuntr

Default branch main · commit ead88c5a · scanned 5/26/2026, 8:43:37 PM

GitHub: 2,662 stars · 306 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface protectai/vulnhuntr, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README's opening statement to emphasize LLM-powered autonomy

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A tool to identify remotely exploitable vulnerabilities using LLMs and static code analysis.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **Vulnhuntr is the world's first autonomous, LLM-powered tool for zero-shot vulnerability discovery**, leveraging static code analysis to identify complex, remotely exploitable 0-day vulnerabilities.
  • highabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://protectai.com/vulnhuntr
  • mediumtopics#3
    Refine repository topics for greater specificity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, llm, security, static-analysis, vulnerability-detection
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, llm, security, static-analysis, vulnerability-detection, 0day, autonomous-security

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface protectai/vulnhuntr
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 1×
  2. Snyk Open Source · recommended 1×
  3. Checkmarx One · recommended 1×
  4. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle · recommended 1×
  5. SonarQube · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I use AI to automatically discover security vulnerabilities in my code?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Snyk Code
    2. Snyk Open Source
    3. Checkmarx One
    4. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
    5. SonarQube
    6. GitHub Advanced Security
    7. Veracode
    8. Fortify Static Code Analyzer

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named protectai/vulnhuntr. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help find complex, multi-step security vulnerabilities using advanced code analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CodeQL (github/codeql)
    2. Semgrep (returntocorp/semgrep)
    3. Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA)
    4. Checkmarx SAST (CxSAST)
    5. Coverity
    6. Kiuwan
    7. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named protectai/vulnhuntr. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of protectai/vulnhuntr?
    pass
    AI named protectai/vulnhuntr explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts protectai/vulnhuntr in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named protectai/vulnhuntr explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo protectai/vulnhuntr solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named protectai/vulnhuntr explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of protectai/vulnhuntr. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/protectai/vulnhuntr.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/protectai/vulnhuntr)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/protectai/vulnhuntr"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/protectai/vulnhuntr.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

protectai/vulnhuntr — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite