RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

qixucen/atom

Default branch main · commit 0fc9a456 · scanned 6/7/2026, 11:38:07 PM

GitHub: 663 stars · 58 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface qixucen/atom, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a clear disambiguation statement to the README's introduction

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **This repository implements Atom of Thoughts (AoT), a novel reasoning framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) – *not* the Atom text editor.** AoT transforms LLM reasoning into a Markov process with atomic states, significantly enhancing performance and reducing computational waste.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    llm, large-language-models, reasoning, ai, neurips, test-time-scaling, markov-process, generative-ai, nlp
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the arXiv paper URL as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12018

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface qixucen/atom
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. DSPy · recommended 2×
  4. Haystack · recommended 2×
  5. Microsoft Guidance · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks enhance large language model reasoning performance and reduce computational waste?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. DSPy
    4. Haystack
    5. Microsoft Guidance
    6. PromptFlow
    7. OpenAI Function Calling

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named qixucen/atom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I integrate a reasoning framework using atomic questions for LLM test-time scaling?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Microsoft Guidance
    4. OpenAI Function Calling
    5. DSPy
    6. Haystack

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named qixucen/atom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of qixucen/atom?
    pass
    AI named qixucen/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts qixucen/atom in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named qixucen/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo qixucen/atom solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named qixucen/atom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of qixucen/atom. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/qixucen/atom.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/qixucen/atom)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/qixucen/atom"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/qixucen/atom.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

qixucen/atom — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite