RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy

Default branch master · commit 1614a5b8 · scanned 6/18/2026, 3:08:11 PM

GitHub: 4,357 stars · 841 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clarify it's a study resource, not a tool collection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Android Application Security Study
安卓应用安全学习
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Android Application Security Study
安卓应用安全学习

This repository provides a comprehensive, structured learning resource and practical guide for Android application security, reverse engineering, and penetration testing, utilizing tools like Frida, Fart, and KernelSU.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    android-security, reverse-engineering, frida, mobile-security, penetration-testing, android-reverse-engineering, kernel-security, malware-analysis
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file or clarify licensing in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) in the root directory, or add a clear statement to the README specifying the license(s) under which the content is distributed.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Jadx-GUI
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Jadx-GUI · recommended 1×
  2. Ghidra · recommended 1×
  3. APKTool · recommended 1×
  4. Frida · recommended 1×
  5. Burp Suite · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective methods for reverse engineering Android applications to find vulnerabilities?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Jadx-GUI
    2. Ghidra
    3. APKTool
    4. Frida
    5. Burp Suite
    6. MobSF
    7. Androguard

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I dynamically analyze and de-obfuscate protected mobile application binaries?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Frida (frida/frida)
    2. objection (sensepost/objection)
    3. Ghidra (NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra)
    4. IDA Pro
    5. Radare2 (radareorg/radare2)
    6. Cutter (rizinorg/cutter)
    7. Xposed Framework (rovo89/XposedBridge)
    8. Cydia Substrate
    9. Magisk (topjohnwu/Magisk)
    10. unc0ver (pwn20wndstuff/unc0ver)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy?
    pass
    AI named r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

r0ysue/AndroidSecurityStudy — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite