RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

raullenchai/Rapid-MLX

Default branch main · commit 9e6d06e5 · scanned 6/18/2026, 12:16:58 AM

GitHub: 2,902 stars · 345 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface raullenchai/Rapid-MLX, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's H1 tagline to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"> <strong>Run AI on your Mac. Faster than anything else.</strong> </p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"> <strong>The fastest local AI engine for Apple Silicon. Drop-in OpenAI replacement with 100% tool calling.</strong> </p>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a concise 'Why Rapid-MLX?' or 'Features' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section like:
    ```
    ## Why Rapid-MLX?
    - **Blazing Fast Local Inference:** Optimized for Apple Silicon, outperforming Ollama by 4.2x.
    - **Drop-in OpenAI API Replacement:** Seamlessly integrate with existing OpenAI-compatible applications.
    - **Robust Tool Calling:** 100% tool calling support with 17 built-in tool parsers.
    - **Prompt Cache & Reasoning Separation:** Advanced features for efficient and intelligent AI interactions.
    ```
  • lowreadme#3
    Explicitly mention performance advantage over Ollama in README intro

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center"> Run local AI models on your Mac — no cloud, no API costs. Works with Cursor, Claude Code, and any OpenAI-compatible app. </p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center"> Run local AI models on your Mac — no cloud, no API costs. It's 4.2x faster than Ollama and works with Cursor, Claude Code, and any OpenAI-compatible app. </p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface raullenchai/Rapid-MLX
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ggerganov/llama.cpp
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ggerganov/llama.cpp · recommended 1×
  2. apple/mlx · recommended 1×
  3. ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
  4. xenova/transformers.js · recommended 1×
  5. WebGPU · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the fastest local LLM inference engines for Apple Silicon Macs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. llama.cpp (ggerganov/llama.cpp)
    2. MLX (apple/mlx)
    3. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    4. Transformers.js (xenova/transformers.js)
    5. WebGPU
    6. WebLLM (mlc-ai/web-llm)
    7. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    8. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    9. tensorflow-metal (apple/tensorflow-metal)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named raullenchai/Rapid-MLX. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a local AI tool with OpenAI API compatibility and robust tool calling on macOS.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LM Studio
    2. Ollama
    3. LocalAI
    4. Jan
    5. GPT4All

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named raullenchai/Rapid-MLX. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of raullenchai/Rapid-MLX?
    pass
    AI named raullenchai/Rapid-MLX explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts raullenchai/Rapid-MLX in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named raullenchai/Rapid-MLX explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo raullenchai/Rapid-MLX solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named raullenchai/Rapid-MLX explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of raullenchai/Rapid-MLX. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/raullenchai/Rapid-MLX.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/raullenchai/Rapid-MLX)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/raullenchai/Rapid-MLX"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/raullenchai/Rapid-MLX.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

raullenchai/Rapid-MLX — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite