RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

redbadger/crux

Default branch master · commit e1680f0b · scanned 6/18/2026, 8:16:49 AM

GitHub: 2,595 stars · 108 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface redbadger/crux, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify Crux's UI-agnostic, shared logic core in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Shared Core for BehaviorCrux helps you share your app's business logic and behavior across mobile (iOS/Android) and web — as a single reusable core built with Rust.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Crux provides a robust, UI-agnostic Rust core for sharing your application's business logic and behavior across mobile (iOS/Android) and web, designed to integrate seamlessly with native UI frameworks like SwiftUI, Jetpack Compose, or web frameworks.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to emphasize shared logic and UI-agnostic nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    mobile-development, rust
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    mobile-development, rust, shared-logic, cross-platform, business-logic, ui-agnostic, web-development
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add an explicit comparison or differentiation statement in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ### How Crux Differs from Full-Stack Frameworks
Unlike comprehensive UI frameworks such as Flutter, React Native, or Tauri, Crux focuses exclusively on providing a shared Rust core for your application's business logic. This allows developers to leverage platform-native UI frameworks (SwiftUI, Jetpack Compose) or web frameworks while centralizing complex logic in Rust.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface redbadger/crux
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Tauri
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Tauri · recommended 2×
  2. React Native · recommended 2×
  3. Flutter · recommended 2×
  4. SwiftUI · recommended 2×
  5. Jetpack Compose · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to share business logic across mobile and web using a Rust core?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tauri
    2. WebAssembly
    3. UniFFI
    4. Swift
    5. JNI
    6. React Native
    7. Flutter
    8. dart:ffi
    9. SwiftUI
    10. Kotlin
    11. Jetpack Compose
    12. serde
    13. cargo-lipo
    14. wasm-pack

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named redbadger/crux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What framework allows building native mobile UIs with a shared Rust backend?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Tauri
    2. Dioxus
    3. Flutter
    4. flutter_rust_bridge
    5. React Native
    6. SwiftUI
    7. Jetpack Compose

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named redbadger/crux. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of redbadger/crux?
    pass
    AI named redbadger/crux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts redbadger/crux in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named redbadger/crux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo redbadger/crux solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named redbadger/crux explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of redbadger/crux. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/redbadger/crux.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/redbadger/crux)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/redbadger/crux"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/redbadger/crux.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

redbadger/crux — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite