RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rednote-hilab/dots.tts

Default branch main · commit b995bdb7 · scanned 6/17/2026, 7:47:35 AM

GitHub: 700 stars · 52 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rednote-hilab/dots.tts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise, accurate description to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    dots.tts is a 2B-parameter fully continuous, end-to-end autoregressive text-to-speech system, achieving state-of-the-art performance on multilingual benchmarks with strong generation stability, voice cloning, and emotional expressiveness.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    text-to-speech, tts, deep-learning, machine-learning, ai, multilingual, voice-cloning, speech-synthesis, autoregressive, flow-matching, state-of-the-art
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add the project's demo page as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://rednote-hilab.github.io/dots.tts-demo/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rednote-hilab/dots.tts
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Coqui TTS
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Coqui TTS · recommended 1×
  2. VITS · recommended 1×
  3. ESPnet · recommended 1×
  4. OpenVoice · recommended 1×
  5. Bark · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best open-source text-to-speech models for multilingual, high-fidelity audio generation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Coqui TTS
    2. VITS
    3. ESPnet
    4. OpenVoice
    5. Bark

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named rednote-hilab/dots.tts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need an end-to-end text-to-speech system with voice cloning and emotional expressiveness capabilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ElevenLabs
    2. Resemble.ai
    3. Descript
    4. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
    5. Amazon Polly
    6. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
    7. Meta Voicebox

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named rednote-hilab/dots.tts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rednote-hilab/dots.tts?
    pass
    AI did not name rednote-hilab/dots.tts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rednote-hilab/dots.tts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rednote-hilab/dots.tts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rednote-hilab/dots.tts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name rednote-hilab/dots.tts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rednote-hilab/dots.tts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rednote-hilab/dots.tts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rednote-hilab/dots.tts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rednote-hilab/dots.tts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rednote-hilab/dots.tts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rednote-hilab/dots.tts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite