RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

redwoodjs/agent-ci

Default branch main · commit c3316730 · scanned 6/6/2026, 10:46:51 PM

GitHub: 700 stars · 16 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface redwoodjs/agent-ci, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumreadme#1
    Add explicit differentiation from nektos/act and other local runners

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Existing "run actions locally" tools either re-implement steps in a compatibility layer or require you to maintain a separate config.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section or expand "Why Agent CI?" with: "## How Agent CI Compares to Other Local Runners
Many tools for running GitHub Actions locally, such as `nektos/act`, re-implement the GitHub Actions runner or steps in a compatibility layer. Agent CI takes a fundamentally different approach: it **replaces the cloud API** that the *official* GitHub Actions Runner talks to. This means you use the exact same runner binary that executes your jobs on GitHub.com, ensuring bit-for-bit fidelity and out-of-the-box compatibility with all official actions (e.g., `actions/checkout`, `actions/setup-node`, `actions/cache`) without patches, forks, or network calls to GitHub. Our bind-mounted cache also provides near-instantaneous caching, unlike traditional upload/download methods."
  • lowlicense#2
    Add a clear statement about the repository's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section to the README: "## License
This repository is licensed under [**INSERT ACTUAL LICENSE NAME(S) HERE**]. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file in the repository root for complete details."

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface redwoodjs/agent-ci
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
nektos/act
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. nektos/act · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub CLI · recommended 2×
  3. VS Code GitHub Actions Extension · recommended 2×
  4. Docker Compose · recommended 2×
  5. Docker · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to debug GitHub Actions workflows locally before pushing to remote?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. nektos/act (nektos/act)
    2. GitHub CLI
    3. VS Code GitHub Actions Extension
    4. Docker
    5. Docker Compose
    6. GitHub Codespaces
    7. Gitpod

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named redwoodjs/agent-ci. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for local GitHub Actions execution and testing?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. nektos/act (nektos/act)
    2. GitHub CLI
    3. VS Code GitHub Actions Extension
    4. Docker Compose
    5. shellcheck
    6. hadolint

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named redwoodjs/agent-ci. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of redwoodjs/agent-ci?
    pass
    AI named redwoodjs/agent-ci explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts redwoodjs/agent-ci in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named redwoodjs/agent-ci explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo redwoodjs/agent-ci solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named redwoodjs/agent-ci explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of redwoodjs/agent-ci. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/redwoodjs/agent-ci.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/redwoodjs/agent-ci)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/redwoodjs/agent-ci"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/redwoodjs/agent-ci.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

redwoodjs/agent-ci — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
redwoodjs/agent-ci — RepoGEO report