RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

refactoringhq/tolaria

Default branch main · commit 77b8d608 · scanned 6/17/2026, 11:31:16 PM

GitHub: 16,630 stars · 1,152 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface refactoringhq/tolaria, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    markdown, knowledge-base, pkm, second-brain, desktop-app, git, offline-first, cross-platform, notes, note-taking
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening statement to prevent miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Tolaria is a desktop app for macOS, Windows, and Linux for managing **markdown knowledge bases**.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Tolaria is a powerful, open-source **desktop app** for macOS, Windows, and Linux, designed for managing your **markdown knowledge bases** and **personal knowledge management (PKM)**. It's built for those who value **files-first, Git-first, and offline-first** principles, offering a robust alternative to cloud-dependent note-taking systems.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Tolaria?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section (e.g., 'Why Tolaria?' or 'Compared to other tools') that highlights Tolaria's core differentiators (files-first, Git-first, offline-first, open source) in contrast to popular alternatives like Obsidian, Logseq, or Joplin.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface refactoringhq/tolaria
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Obsidian
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Obsidian · recommended 2×
  2. denolehov/obsidian-git · recommended 1×
  3. laurent22/joplin · recommended 1×
  4. microsoft/vscode · recommended 1×
  5. yzhang-gh/vscode-markdown · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best cross-platform desktop apps for managing markdown notes with Git versioning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Obsidian Git (denolehov/obsidian-git)
    3. Joplin (laurent22/joplin)
    4. VS Code (microsoft/vscode)
    5. Markdown All in One (yzhang-gh/vscode-markdown)
    6. Markdown Preview Enhanced (shd101wyy/vscode-markdown-preview-enhanced)
    7. Notable (notable/notable)
    8. Typora

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named refactoringhq/tolaria. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a personal knowledge management system that stores data as plain markdown files.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Logseq
    3. Joplin
    4. VS Code
    5. Markdown All in One
    6. Markdown Preview Enhanced
    7. Foam
    8. Dendron
    9. Zettlr
    10. Notable

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named refactoringhq/tolaria. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of refactoringhq/tolaria?
    pass
    AI named refactoringhq/tolaria explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts refactoringhq/tolaria in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named refactoringhq/tolaria explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo refactoringhq/tolaria solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named refactoringhq/tolaria explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of refactoringhq/tolaria. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/refactoringhq/tolaria.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/refactoringhq/tolaria)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/refactoringhq/tolaria"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/refactoringhq/tolaria.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

refactoringhq/tolaria — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite