RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

riba2534/happyclaw

Default branch main · commit 8c94111c · scanned 6/2/2026, 6:32:25 PM

GitHub: 732 stars · 140 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface riba2534/happyclaw, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to clearly state its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    happy happy happyclaw~
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    自托管多用户AI Agent系统，基于Claude Code，支持多平台集成（飞书、Telegram等），提供文件读写、终端操作、浏览器自动化等能力。
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve category visibility

    Why:

    CURRENT
    openclaw
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, self-hosted, multi-user, claude-code, feishu-bot, telegram-bot, llm-agent, agent-system, browser-automation, terminal-operations
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add an explicit English subtitle to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">
  自托管的多用户本地 AI Agent 系统 — Powered By Claude Code.
</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">
  自托管的多用户本地 AI Agent 系统 — Powered By Claude Code.
  <br/>
  A self-hosted, multi-user AI Agent system powered by Claude Code.
</p>

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface riba2534/happyclaw
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
langchain-ai/langchain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  5. FastAPI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to deploy a self-hosted multi-user AI agent system with chat platform integrations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGen
    4. FastAPI
    5. Express
    6. Gin
    7. Slack API/SDK
    8. Discord API/SDK
    9. Telegram Bot API
    10. Microsoft Teams Bot Framework
    11. WhatsApp Business API
    12. Docker
    13. Kubernetes
    14. Hugging Face Inference Endpoints
    15. LocalAI
    16. Ollama
    17. Botpress
    18. Rasa

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named riba2534/happyclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI agent platform capable of terminal operations and browser automation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Playwright (microsoft/playwright)
    2. CrewAI (joaomdmoura/crewAI)
    3. LangChain Agents (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. Autogen (microsoft/autogen)
    5. LangChain Agents (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. Puppeteer (puppeteer/puppeteer)
    7. Selenium WebDriver (SeleniumHQ/selenium)
    8. Robocorp

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named riba2534/happyclaw. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of riba2534/happyclaw?
    pass
    AI named riba2534/happyclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts riba2534/happyclaw in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named riba2534/happyclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo riba2534/happyclaw solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named riba2534/happyclaw explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of riba2534/happyclaw. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/riba2534/happyclaw.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/riba2534/happyclaw)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/riba2534/happyclaw"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/riba2534/happyclaw.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

riba2534/happyclaw — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite