RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rjs/shaping-skills

Default branch main · commit d8b65d77 · scanned 5/13/2026, 9:28:09 PM

GitHub: 1,044 stars · 75 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rjs/shaping-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Shaping Skills

Claude Code skills for shaping and breadboarding — the methodology from Shape Up adapted for working with an LLM.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Shaping Skills for LLMs

**AI-powered project shaping and breadboarding skills for Claude.** This repository provides a collection of prompt engineering techniques and structured conversation flows, adapted from the Shape Up methodology, to help product teams and solo builders define, scope, and kick off projects using large language models like Claude.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, llm, claude, prompt-engineering, shape-up, product-management, project-shaping, breadboarding
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root, choosing an appropriate open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0) to clarify usage rights.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rjs/shaping-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ClickUp AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ClickUp AI · recommended 2×
  2. Notion AI · recommended 2×
  3. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  4. Miro Assist · recommended 1×
  5. Coda AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    AI tools for structuring initial project ideas from team discussions
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Miro Assist
    2. ClickUp AI
    3. Notion AI
    4. ChatGPT
    5. Coda AI

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named rjs/shaping-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to use AI to generate structured project shaping and kickoff documents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Google Gemini
    4. Notion AI
    5. ClickUp AI
    6. Microsoft Copilot

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named rjs/shaping-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rjs/shaping-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name rjs/shaping-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rjs/shaping-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rjs/shaping-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rjs/shaping-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name rjs/shaping-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rjs/shaping-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rjs/shaping-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rjs/shaping-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rjs/shaping-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rjs/shaping-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rjs/shaping-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite