RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

roborev-dev/roborev

Default branch main · commit ce9a978f · scanned 6/17/2026, 2:11:55 PM

GitHub: 1,404 stars · 122 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface roborev-dev/roborev, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to categorize the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, generative-ai, code-review, llm, developer-tools, git-hooks, static-analysis-for-ai
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence to emphasize 'AI-generated code'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Continuous code review for AI coding agents. roborev runs in the background, reviews every commit as agents write code, and surfaces issues in seconds -- before they compound. Pull code reviews into your agentic loop while context is fresh.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Continuous background code review for **AI-generated code** and **AI coding agents**. roborev runs in the background, reviews every commit as agents write code, and surfaces issues in seconds -- before they compound. Pull code reviews into your agentic loop while context is fresh.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README differentiating from generic tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section (e.g., 'How is roborev different?') explaining that roborev is purpose-built for the unique challenges of AI-generated code, focusing on agentic loops and real-time feedback, unlike traditional static analysis tools designed for human-written code.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface roborev-dev/roborev
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
SonarQube
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. SonarQube · recommended 2×
  2. DeepSource · recommended 2×
  3. Pylint · recommended 2×
  4. CodeClimate · recommended 1×
  5. GitHub Actions · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to continuously review code generated by AI agents automatically?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SonarQube
    2. DeepSource
    3. CodeClimate
    4. GitHub Actions
    5. GitLab CI/CD
    6. ESLint
    7. Pylint
    8. Black
    9. Snyk
    10. OWASP Dependency-Check
    11. Bandit
    12. Prometheus
    13. Grafana
    14. Hugging Face Transformers

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named roborev-dev/roborev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for real-time code quality feedback on AI agent commits?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DeepSource
    2. SonarQube
    3. GitHub CodeQL
    4. Codacy
    5. LGTM.com
    6. Pylint
    7. Flake8

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named roborev-dev/roborev. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of roborev-dev/roborev?
    pass
    AI named roborev-dev/roborev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts roborev-dev/roborev in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named roborev-dev/roborev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo roborev-dev/roborev solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named roborev-dev/roborev explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of roborev-dev/roborev. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/roborev-dev/roborev.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/roborev-dev/roborev)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/roborev-dev/roborev"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/roborev-dev/roborev.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

roborev-dev/roborev — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite