RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher

Default branch main · commit 9fbe665d · scanned 5/25/2026, 4:21:53 PM

GitHub: 1,388 stars · 242 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise English summary to the top of the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (The current README starts with a Chinese subtitle after the English H1)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add this line directly under "# Codex Session Patcher": "A lightweight Python tool for cleaning AI coding assistant refusal responses and injecting CTF/penetration testing prompts into session files."
  • mediumlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with your chosen open-source license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ollama/ollama
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ollama/ollama · recommended 1×
  2. Llama 3 · recommended 1×
  3. Mixtral · recommended 1×
  4. LM Studio · recommended 1×
  5. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to fix AI coding assistant refusals in session files for security tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Ollama (ollama/ollama)
    2. Llama 3
    3. Mixtral
    4. LM Studio
    5. Hugging Face Transformers Library (huggingface/transformers)
    6. Falcon 7B/40B
    7. Hugging Face PEFT (huggingface/peft)
    8. OpenAI Fine-tuning API
    9. Sec-PaLM

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to inject security testing context into AI code generation prompts to avoid refusals?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. PromptLayer
    4. Weights & Biases Prompts
    5. Guardrails AI
    6. Jinja2
    7. OpenAI API

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher?
    pass
    AI did not name ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

ryfineZ/codex-session-patcher — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite