REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
s-kostyaev/ellama
Default branch main · commit bbee2a0d · scanned 5/29/2026, 6:02:54 AM
GitHub: 943 stars · 61 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface s-kostyaev/ellama, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Clarify the project's core technology in the README's opening sentence
Why:
CURRENTEllama is a tool for interacting with large language models from Emacs.
COPY-PASTE FIXEllama is an Emacs Lisp package for interacting with large language models directly within Emacs.
- mediumhomepage#2Add a homepage link to the repository metadata
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXhttps://melpa.org/#/ellama
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- zerolfx/emacs-copilot · recommended 1×
- karthink/llm.el · recommended 1×
- karthink/gptel · recommended 1×
- joshua-stone/ollama.el · recommended 1×
- joshua-stone/emacs-openai · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow can I integrate a large language model assistant directly into my Emacs environment for text processing?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- emacs-copilot (zerolfx/emacs-copilot)
- llm.el (karthink/llm.el)
- gptel (karthink/gptel)
- ollama.el (joshua-stone/ollama.el)
- emacs-openai (joshua-stone/emacs-openai)
- embark-llm (karthink/embark-llm)
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named s-kostyaev/ellama. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat tools allow me to perform AI-powered code review and summarization within my Emacs editor?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- ChatGPT
- chatgpt.el
- llm.el
- GitHub Copilot
- copilot.el
- Codeium
- codeium.el
- OpenAI API
- ollama.el
- Ollama server
- Llama 3
- Mistral
- Code Llama
- text-generation-webui
AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named s-kostyaev/ellama. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesswarn
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of s-kostyaev/ellama?passAI named s-kostyaev/ellama explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts s-kostyaev/ellama in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named s-kostyaev/ellama explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo s-kostyaev/ellama solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name s-kostyaev/ellama — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of s-kostyaev/ellama. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/s-kostyaev/ellama)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/s-kostyaev/ellama"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/s-kostyaev/ellama.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
s-kostyaev/ellama — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite