RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

securego/gosec

Default branch master · commit bd17b258 · scanned 5/30/2026, 5:31:26 AM

GitHub: 8,841 stars · 697 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
93 /100
Healthy
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface securego/gosec, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumreadme#1
    Refine README's opening sentence for clearer positioning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Inspects source code for security problems by scanning the Go AST and SSA code representation.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Gosec is a static analysis tool designed to detect potential security vulnerabilities in Go source code, primarily serving Go developers and security teams.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Why Gosec?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Gosec?
    While general-purpose SAST tools like Snyk Code or SonarQube offer broad language support, Gosec is purpose-built for Go. It leverages deep Go AST and SSA code representation analysis to provide highly accurate and Go-idiomatic security vulnerability detection, making it an essential tool for Go developers and security teams focused on their Go codebase.
  • lowtopics#3
    Add 'sast' to repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    golang, security, security-automation, security-tools, static-analysis, static-code-analysis
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    golang, security, security-automation, security-tools, static-analysis, static-code-analysis, sast

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface securego/gosec
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
17%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Snyk Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Snyk Code · recommended 2×
  2. Checkmarx · recommended 1×
  3. SonarQube · recommended 1×
  4. Semgrep · recommended 1×
  5. MegaLinter · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are effective static analysis tools for identifying security vulnerabilities in Go applications?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GoSec ← you
    2. Snyk Code
    3. Checkmarx
    4. SonarQube
    5. Semgrep
    6. MegaLinter
    7. golangci-lint
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically scan my Go codebase for common security problems?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GoSec (securego/gosec) ← you
    2. Semgrep (returntocorp/semgrep)
    3. Snyk Code
    4. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)
    5. Checkmarx CxSAST
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of securego/gosec?
    pass
    AI named securego/gosec explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts securego/gosec in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named securego/gosec explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo securego/gosec solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named securego/gosec explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of securego/gosec. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/securego/gosec.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/securego/gosec)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/securego/gosec"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/securego/gosec.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

securego/gosec — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite