RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sierra-research/tau-bench

Default branch main · commit 59a200c6 · scanned 6/18/2026, 7:08:10 AM

GitHub: 1,280 stars · 203 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sierra-research/tau-bench, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README to clearly state archival status and direct to τ³-bench

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
    
    **⚠️ WARNING: The tasks in this repo are not updated.** This repository contains outdated versions of the airline and retail tasks. Please use τ³-bench for the latest fixed tasks and new domains.
    
    **❗News**: The τ²-bench repository has been updated to τ³-bench, which includes a new `banking` domain, a `voice` evaluation modality, as well as fixes to the `airline` and `retail` domain tasks. Please navigate to the τ³-bench repository to use the latest version of this benchmark.
    
    We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # τ-bench: Historical Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction (See τ³-bench for latest)
    
    **This repository contains an outdated version of the τ-bench benchmark.** For the latest tasks, new domains (like `banking`), and fixes to `airline` and `retail` domains, **please navigate to the [τ³-bench repository](https://github.com/sierra-research/tau3-bench) to use the active version of this benchmark.**
    
    This repository serves as an archive for the original $\tau$-bench, which emulated dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines.
  • mediumabout#2
    Update the repository description to reflect its archival status

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Code and Data for Tau-Bench
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Historical code and data for τ-bench, an outdated benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction. Please use τ³-bench for the latest version.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sierra-research/tau-bench
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ALFWorld
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ALFWorld · recommended 1×
  2. WebArena · recommended 1×
  3. ToolBench · recommended 1×
  4. MiniWoB++ · recommended 1×
  5. HumanEval · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What benchmarks exist for evaluating AI agents that interact with users and external tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ALFWorld
    2. WebArena
    3. ToolBench
    4. MiniWoB++
    5. HumanEval
    6. GAIA
    7. AgentBench

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named sierra-research/tau-bench. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to assess language models' performance in dynamic, multi-turn conversations using domain APIs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rasa NLU/Core
    2. DeepPavlov
    3. ParlAI
    4. Haystack
    5. Appen
    6. Scale AI
    7. Amazon Mechanical Turk
    8. Elastic Stack
    9. Elasticsearch
    10. Logstash
    11. Kibana
    12. Prometheus
    13. Grafana

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named sierra-research/tau-bench. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sierra-research/tau-bench?
    pass
    AI named sierra-research/tau-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sierra-research/tau-bench in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sierra-research/tau-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sierra-research/tau-bench solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sierra-research/tau-bench explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sierra-research/tau-bench. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sierra-research/tau-bench.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sierra-research/tau-bench)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sierra-research/tau-bench"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sierra-research/tau-bench.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sierra-research/tau-bench — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite