RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sifive/freedom

Default branch master · commit b348a50d · scanned 6/28/2026, 11:32:06 PM

GitHub: 1,145 stars · 280 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sifive/freedom, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the main heading of the README to state the repository's purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Freedom
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Freedom: Open-source RTL designs for SiFive RISC-V CPUs on FPGA development boards
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the official project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert official project homepage URL here]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sifive/freedom
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
VexRiscv
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. VexRiscv · recommended 1×
  2. Picorv32 · recommended 1×
  3. SweRV EL2 · recommended 1×
  4. Rocket Chip · recommended 1×
  5. BOOM · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are good open-source RTL designs for RISC-V CPU on FPGA development boards?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VexRiscv
    2. Picorv32
    3. SweRV EL2
    4. Rocket Chip
    5. BOOM
    6. SERV (SweRV EH1 Minimal)
    7. LowRISC Ibex (formerly PULP RI5CY)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named sifive/freedom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to implement an embedded system with autonomous boot on an FPGA evaluation board?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Intel Cyclone V SoC Development Kit
    2. Xilinx Zynq-7000 All Programmable SoC Evaluation Kit
    3. ZedBoard
    4. ZCU102
    5. Digilent Arty A7-35T/100T
    6. Xilinx MicroBlaze
    7. Terasic DE10-Nano
    8. Lattice ECP5 Versa Development Kit
    9. VexRiscv (SpinalHDL/VexRiscv)
    10. Yocto Project (YoctoProject/poky)
    11. Buildroot (buildroot/buildroot)
    12. PetaLinux
    13. Intel SoC EDS
    14. FreeRTOS (FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS)
    15. Intel Quartus Prime
    16. Xilinx Vivado
    17. Digilent Adept
    18. GNU Toolchain
    19. GCC (gcc-mirror/gcc)
    20. GDB (bminor/binutils-gdb)
    21. Intel SoC EDS (Embedded Development Suite)
    22. Xilinx Vitis
    23. SDK
    24. SDSoC
    25. U-Boot (u-boot/u-boot)

    AI recommended 25 alternatives but never named sifive/freedom. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sifive/freedom?
    pass
    AI named sifive/freedom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sifive/freedom in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sifive/freedom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sifive/freedom solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sifive/freedom explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sifive/freedom. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sifive/freedom.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sifive/freedom)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sifive/freedom"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sifive/freedom.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sifive/freedom — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite