RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

slavingia/skills

Default branch main · commit eb9f57fb · scanned 5/28/2026, 6:17:46 AM

GitHub: 8,884 stars · 915 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface slavingia/skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    entrepreneurship, business-ideas, startup, mvp, pricing, marketing, sahil-lavingia, claude-code, ai-assistant, business-guidance
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen README's opening sentence to clarify purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Claude Code skills based on The Minimalist Entrepreneur by Sahil Lavingia.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a collection of Claude Code skills designed to guide entrepreneurs through key stages of building a business, directly applying principles from Sahil Lavingia's 'The Minimalist Entrepreneur'.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root. Consider a permissive open-source license like MIT or Apache-2.0 to encourage adoption and reuse, or choose one that best fits the project's intent.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface slavingia/skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Lean Canvas
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Lean Canvas · recommended 1×
  2. Customer Development · recommended 1×
  3. User Story Mapping · recommended 1×
  4. Google Forms · recommended 1×
  5. Typeform · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can an AI assistant guide me through validating a new business idea and launching an MVP?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Lean Canvas
    2. Customer Development
    3. User Story Mapping
    4. Google Forms
    5. Typeform
    6. SurveyMonkey
    7. Figma
    8. Sketch
    9. Adobe XD
    10. Webflow
    11. Leadpages
    12. Unbounce
    13. Carrd
    14. Bubble
    15. Adalo
    16. Glide
    17. Softr

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named slavingia/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can help entrepreneurs find early customers and develop effective pricing strategies?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Survicate
    2. UserTesting
    3. Qualtrics
    4. Pricefx
    5. Pricelabs
    6. Segment
    7. ChatGPT
    8. Bard

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named slavingia/skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of slavingia/skills?
    pass
    AI named slavingia/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts slavingia/skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named slavingia/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo slavingia/skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named slavingia/skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of slavingia/skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/slavingia/skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/slavingia/skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/slavingia/skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/slavingia/skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

slavingia/skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite