RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

snipeship/ccflare

Default branch main · commit 95c4c6a1 · scanned 6/15/2026, 6:07:34 AM

GitHub: 992 stars · 121 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface snipeship/ccflare, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Clarify the repository description to explicitly state its function as an AI API proxy

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The ultimate CC proxy
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A multi-provider native proxy for Anthropic and OpenAI APIs, handling routing, load balancing, and observability.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to reflect AI API proxy/gateway functionality

    Why:

    CURRENT
    anthropic-api, anthropic-claude, claude, claude-api, claude-code, codex, codex-cli
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-proxy, api-gateway, openai-api, anthropic-api, llm-proxy, load-balancing, rate-limiting, api-management, observability, developer-tools
  • mediumreadme#3
    Update the README's main heading to immediately clarify its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ccflare 🛡️
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ccflare 🛡️: Multi-Provider Native Proxy for Anthropic and OpenAI APIs

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface snipeship/ccflare
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
AWS API Gateway
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. AWS API Gateway · recommended 2×
  2. Azure API Management · recommended 2×
  3. NGINX Plus · recommended 1×
  4. nginx/nginx · recommended 1×
  5. envoyproxy/envoy · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to route and load balance requests across multiple AI model APIs and accounts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NGINX Plus
    2. NGINX Open Source (nginx/nginx)
    3. Envoy Proxy (envoyproxy/envoy)
    4. HAProxy (haproxy/haproxy)
    5. Kong Gateway (Kong/kong)
    6. AWS API Gateway
    7. Azure API Management
    8. Google Cloud Endpoints
    9. Apigee
    10. Caddy (caddyserver/caddy)
    11. Flask (pallets/flask)
    12. Express.js (expressjs/express)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named snipeship/ccflare. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for monitoring AI API usage, handling rate limits, and ensuring account failover?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Evals
    2. LangChain
    3. LiteLLM
    4. Helicone.ai
    5. Portkey.ai
    6. AWS API Gateway
    7. Azure API Management
    8. NGINX
    9. Prometheus
    10. Grafana

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named snipeship/ccflare. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of snipeship/ccflare?
    pass
    AI named snipeship/ccflare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts snipeship/ccflare in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named snipeship/ccflare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo snipeship/ccflare solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named snipeship/ccflare explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of snipeship/ccflare. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/snipeship/ccflare.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/snipeship/ccflare)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/snipeship/ccflare"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/snipeship/ccflare.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

snipeship/ccflare — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite