RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sopaco/deepwiki-rs

Default branch main · commit 6bd83afa · scanned 5/29/2026, 7:26:57 AM

GitHub: 1,007 stars · 126 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sopaco/deepwiki-rs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the project's core identity in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p align="center">💪🏻 High-performance <strong>AI-driven</strong> intelligent document generator (DeepWiki-like) built with <strong>Rust</strong></p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p align="center">💪🏻 High-performance <strong>AI-driven</strong> intelligent documentation generator for codebases, built with <strong>Rust</strong>. Litho automatically creates structured, AI-ready technical docs and C4 model diagrams.</p>
  • hightopics#2
    Refine topics to remove ambiguity and improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    claude, deepseek, deepwiki, llm, mistral, openai, openrouter, rust, wiki
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude, deepseek, llm, mistral, openai, openrouter, rust, documentation, code-documentation, architecture-diagrams, c4-model, ai-powered
  • mediumreadme#3
    Enhance README with explicit comparison or use cases for documentation generation

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Why Litho? (Compared to Traditional Docs)' or '## How Litho Compares' that explicitly positions it against tools like Doxygen, Sphinx, or manual documentation, highlighting its AI and C4 model advantages. For example, 'Unlike traditional documentation tools like Doxygen or Sphinx, Litho leverages AI to automatically generate and synchronize comprehensive architecture documentation in the C4 model format, eliminating manual effort and ensuring accuracy.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sopaco/deepwiki-rs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Doxygen
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Doxygen · recommended 1×
  2. sphinx-doc/sphinx · recommended 1×
  3. jsdoc/jsdoc · recommended 1×
  4. swagger-api/swagger-ui · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAPITools/openapi-generator · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a tool to automatically generate and synchronize technical documentation from source code.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Doxygen
    2. Sphinx (sphinx-doc/sphinx)
    3. JSDoc (jsdoc/jsdoc)
    4. Swagger UI (swagger-api/swagger-ui)
    5. OpenAPI Generator (OpenAPITools/openapi-generator)
    6. DocFX (dotnet/docfx)
    7. MkDocs (mkdocs/mkdocs)
    8. TypeDoc (TypeStrong/typedoc)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named sopaco/deepwiki-rs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI-powered tools for generating code architecture diagrams and wikis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mermaid Chart
    2. Mermaid Live Editor
    3. GitHub Copilot
    4. ChatGPT
    5. Google Gemini
    6. PlantUML
    7. Diagrams.net
    8. GPT-4
    9. Whimsical AI
    10. Lucidchart
    11. Structurizr
    12. CodeSee

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named sopaco/deepwiki-rs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sopaco/deepwiki-rs?
    pass
    AI named sopaco/deepwiki-rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sopaco/deepwiki-rs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sopaco/deepwiki-rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sopaco/deepwiki-rs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sopaco/deepwiki-rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sopaco/deepwiki-rs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sopaco/deepwiki-rs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sopaco/deepwiki-rs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sopaco/deepwiki-rs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sopaco/deepwiki-rs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sopaco/deepwiki-rs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite