RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills

Default branch main · commit 773b571d · scanned 7/1/2026, 2:07:45 PM

GitHub: 512 stars · 86 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and description to emphasize AI agent workflows

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Awesome Cursor Skills [](https://awesome.re)
> A curated list of awesome skills for Cursor, the AI code editor.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Awesome Cursor AI Agent Skills & Workflows [](https://awesome.re)
> A curated list of reusable AI agent instruction files and workflows for Cursor, the AI code editor.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cursor-ai, ai-agent, ai-coding, awesome-list, developer-tools, workflows
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to clarify usage rights

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT License) in the repository root to clarify usage rights.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. Tabnine · recommended 1×
  3. Amazon CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  4. Cursor · recommended 1×
  5. Replit AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for pre-defined AI assistant workflows to automate repetitive coding tasks.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. Tabnine
    3. Amazon CodeWhisperer
    4. Cursor
    5. Replit AI
    6. CodiumAI
    7. JetBrains AI Assistant

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find shared instruction sets for an intelligent coding agent?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain Hub
    2. Awesome Prompt Engineering
    3. OpenAI Cookbook
    4. Hugging Face Hub
    5. Auto-GPT
    6. BabyAGI
    7. AgentGPT
    8. LlamaIndex
    9. Weights & Biases Prompts
    10. Confluence
    11. Notion

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills?
    pass
    AI did not name spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite