RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

stagewise-io/stagewise

Default branch main · commit 694ae1f7 · scanned 5/26/2026, 5:22:25 PM

GitHub: 6,681 stars · 487 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface stagewise-io/stagewise, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's main heading to explicitly state core purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ### The Open Source Agentic IDE for Developers
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Stagewise: The Open Source Agentic IDE for Orchestrating AI Coding Agents with Debugging Access
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics with specific AI agent and developer workflow terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agent-orchestration, ide
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, agent-orchestration, ide, ai-agents, coding-agents, developer-tools, llm-development, debugging
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a dedicated section comparing Stagewise to common alternatives

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why Stagewise? (or ## Comparison to Alternatives)

Unlike [Competitor A, e.g., Continue], Stagewise offers [specific differentiator]. While [Competitor B, e.g., GitHub Copilot Chat] provides [feature], Stagewise focuses on [unique value proposition, e.g., full IDE integration with debugging access for agents].

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface stagewise-io/stagewise
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Continue
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Continue · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 2×
  3. VS Code · recommended 1×
  4. CodeGPT · recommended 1×
  5. Cursorless · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I find an open-source IDE for orchestrating AI coding agents?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code
    2. CodeGPT
    3. Continue
    4. Cursorless
    5. GitHub Copilot Chat
    6. GitHub Copilot
    7. JupyterLab
    8. Neovim/Vim
    9. nvim-cmp
    10. nvim-dap
    11. Emacs
    12. Eglot
    13. LSP-Mode
    14. Theia

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named stagewise-io/stagewise. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools integrate AI coding agents directly into my development workflow with debugging access?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. GitHub Copilot Chat
    3. Continue
    4. Codeium
    5. Tabnine Chat

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named stagewise-io/stagewise. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of stagewise-io/stagewise?
    pass
    AI named stagewise-io/stagewise explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts stagewise-io/stagewise in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named stagewise-io/stagewise explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo stagewise-io/stagewise solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named stagewise-io/stagewise explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of stagewise-io/stagewise. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/stagewise-io/stagewise.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/stagewise-io/stagewise)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/stagewise-io/stagewise"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/stagewise-io/stagewise.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

stagewise-io/stagewise — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite