RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks

Default branch master · commit 9d880233 · scanned 6/2/2026, 12:47:57 PM

GitHub: 639 stars · 91 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a standard open-source LICENSE file

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (no LICENSE file detected — the repo has no recognizable license)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the text of a standard open-source license, such as MIT or Apache-2.0.
  • highreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence to emphasize its role as a definitive paper collection

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains a curated list of papers related to privacy attacks against machine learning.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository is the definitive curated list of research papers and associated code on privacy attacks against machine learning, serving as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include more specific keywords for research and security

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, awesome-list, machine-learning, privacy
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome, awesome-list, machine-learning, privacy, machine-learning-security, ml-privacy-attacks, research-papers

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
arXiv.org
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. arXiv.org · recommended 1×
  2. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  3. ACM Digital Library · recommended 1×
  4. IEEE Xplore Digital Library · recommended 1×
  5. Microsoft Academic · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find research papers on privacy vulnerabilities in machine learning models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. arXiv.org
    2. Google Scholar
    3. ACM Digital Library
    4. IEEE Xplore Digital Library
    5. Microsoft Academic
    6. OpenReview.net
    7. Zotero
    8. Mendeley

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are common privacy attacks against machine learning models and how can I test for them?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. IBM ART (Adversarial Robustness Toolbox) (Trusted-AI/adversarial-robustness-toolbox)
    2. Microsoft Counterfit (Azure/counterfit)
    3. TensorFlow (tensorflow/tensorflow)
    4. PyTorch (pytorch/pytorch)
    5. scikit-learn (scikit-learn/scikit-learn)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks?
    pass
    AI did not name stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

stratosphereips/awesome-ml-privacy-attacks — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite