RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

synacktiv/HopLa

Default branch main · commit 82eb03cd · scanned 6/7/2026, 7:18:04 PM

GitHub: 826 stars · 84 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface synacktiv/HopLa, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to explicitly state its category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This extension enhances Burp Suite with intelligent autocompletion and built-in payloads to simplify intrusion testing.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    HopLa is a Burp Suite Extender plugin that enhances your web security testing with AI-powered autocompletion, chat, and a comprehensive set of built-in payloads.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add the official project page or a relevant documentation link (e.g., a Synacktiv blog post or dedicated project page for HopLa).
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a dedicated section clarifying HopLa's role as a Burp Suite plugin

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps after 'Features', titled 'What is HopLa?' or 'Why HopLa?' that explicitly states: 'HopLa is not a standalone web proxy or security scanner. It is an essential *Extender plugin for Burp Suite* designed to augment your existing Burp workflow, providing AI-driven assistance and payload management directly within your favorite proxy tool.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface synacktiv/HopLa
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Postman
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Postman · recommended 2×
  2. Burp Suite · recommended 1×
  3. scikit-learn · recommended 1×
  4. TensorFlow · recommended 1×
  5. OWASP ZAP · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate AI capabilities and smart autocompletion into web security proxy tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Burp Suite
    2. scikit-learn
    3. TensorFlow
    4. OWASP ZAP
    5. Mitmproxy
    6. Keras
    7. PyTorch
    8. Postman
    9. Flask
    10. Scapy
    11. Twisted

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named synacktiv/HopLa. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a productivity tool for security proxies offering one-click payloads and request transformation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Burp Suite Professional
    2. OWASP ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy)
    3. Postman
    4. Fiddler Everywhere
    5. mitmproxy
    6. Insomnia

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named synacktiv/HopLa. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of synacktiv/HopLa?
    pass
    AI named synacktiv/HopLa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts synacktiv/HopLa in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named synacktiv/HopLa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo synacktiv/HopLa solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named synacktiv/HopLa explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of synacktiv/HopLa. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/synacktiv/HopLa.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/synacktiv/HopLa)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/synacktiv/HopLa"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/synacktiv/HopLa.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

synacktiv/HopLa — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite