RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories

Default branch main · commit 39f4fb17 · scanned 5/25/2026, 6:37:40 PM

GitHub: 3,040 stars · 391 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize "awesome list" and "repositories"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A curated list of resources dedicated to open source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is an **awesome list** of curated open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT, OpenAI API, and Codex. It serves as a comprehensive collection for developers, researchers, and enthusiasts seeking relevant tools and projects.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Refine topics to improve categorization as a list of repositories

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agent, agent-skills, ai, awesome, awesome-list, chatgpt, codex, gpt-5, llm, openai, skills
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agent, ai, awesome, awesome-list, chatgpt, codex, llm, openai, llm-repositories, resource-list, curated-list, open-source-projects
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a "Comparison & Differentiators" section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Comparison & Differentiators

Unlike general LLM resource lists, `awesome-ChatGPT-repositories` focuses exclusively on **open-source GitHub repositories** related to ChatGPT, OpenAI API, and Codex. Its key differentiator is the integrated search functionality via Claude Code, allowing users to query over 2,500 curated repositories directly from their AI assistant, filtering by topic, category, or language, and receiving scored results.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Hugging Face Hub
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Hugging Face Hub · recommended 1×
  2. Awesome-LLM · recommended 1×
  3. Awesome-Transformers · recommended 1×
  4. Open LLM Leaderboard by Hugging Face · recommended 1×
  5. Papers With Code · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated collection of open-source projects for large language model development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Hub
    2. Awesome-LLM
    3. Awesome-Transformers
    4. Open LLM Leaderboard by Hugging Face
    5. Papers With Code
    6. The Pile

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for open-source agent frameworks or chatbot UI libraries for AI applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. Haystack
    4. AutoGen
    5. CrewAI
    6. Streamlit
    7. Gradio
    8. React Chatbot Kit
    9. Botpress
    10. Rasa Webchat

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories?
    pass
    AI did not name taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite