RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tanweai/wooyun-legacy

Default branch main · commit 910450a3 · scanned 5/15/2026, 8:43:16 AM

GitHub: 1,620 stars · 339 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tanweai/wooyun-legacy, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify its core function for AI reports

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # WooYun Legacy
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # WooYun Legacy: Enhance AI Security Reports with Real-World Vulnerability Data
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AI security, vulnerability data, Claude plugin, security reports, penetration testing, business logic flaws, historical vulnerabilities
  • mediumabout#3
    Update the 'About' description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    wooyun-legacy skill for claude code
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A Claude Code plugin that enhances AI security reports and penetration tests with real-world WooYun vulnerability examples, quantitative data, and data-driven prioritization.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tanweai/wooyun-legacy
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CVE
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CVE · recommended 1×
  2. NVD · recommended 1×
  3. MITRE ATLAS · recommended 1×
  4. AI Village · recommended 1×
  5. Google Scholar · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make AI security reports more convincing with real-world vulnerability examples?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CVE
    2. NVD
    3. MITRE ATLAS
    4. AI Village
    5. Google Scholar
    6. arXiv
    7. Black Hat
    8. DEF CON
    9. The Hacker News
    10. BleepingComputer
    11. Dark Reading
    12. IBM Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) (Trusted-AI/adversarial-robustness-toolbox)
    13. Microsoft Counterfit (Azure/counterfit)

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named tanweai/wooyun-legacy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a tool to add data-backed prioritization and case studies to security penetration tests.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DefectDojo (DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo)
    2. ThreadFix
    3. Brinqa
    4. Vulcan Cyber
    5. Faraday (infobyte/faraday)

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named tanweai/wooyun-legacy. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tanweai/wooyun-legacy?
    pass
    AI named tanweai/wooyun-legacy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tanweai/wooyun-legacy in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tanweai/wooyun-legacy explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tanweai/wooyun-legacy solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name tanweai/wooyun-legacy — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tanweai/wooyun-legacy. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tanweai/wooyun-legacy.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tanweai/wooyun-legacy)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tanweai/wooyun-legacy"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tanweai/wooyun-legacy.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tanweai/wooyun-legacy — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite