RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

taranjeet/awesome-gpts

Default branch main · commit 0d1e1c44 · scanned 5/14/2026, 2:07:49 AM

GitHub: 1,356 stars · 97 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface taranjeet/awesome-gpts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify its unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # awesome-gpts

Awesome GPTs is a collection of all GPTs created by the community.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # awesome-gpts

A community-curated awesome list of custom GPTs, designed to help you discover specialized AI assistants for diverse use cases. This collection differentiates from general AI directories and the official GPT Store by focusing on quality, community contributions, and easy exploration of user-created AI agents.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more descriptive topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    awesome, awesome-list, chatgpt, gpts, gptstore, lists, resources
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    awesome, awesome-list, chatgpt, gpts, gptstore, lists, resources, curated-list, ai-agents, ai-tools-collection, community-curated
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/taranjeet/awesome-gpts

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface taranjeet/awesome-gpts
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Futurepedia
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Futurepedia · recommended 1×
  2. There's An AI For That (TAIAT) · recommended 1×
  3. AI Tools Directory (by AI Tools Club) · recommended 1×
  4. Product Hunt · recommended 1×
  5. G2 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a comprehensive list of specialized AI assistants for different use cases?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Futurepedia
    2. There's An AI For That (TAIAT)
    3. AI Tools Directory (by AI Tools Club)
    4. Product Hunt
    5. G2
    6. Capterra
    7. TopApps.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named taranjeet/awesome-gpts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to explore a curated collection of user-created AI agents and custom models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Hub
    2. GitHub
    3. Kaggle
    4. OpenAI GPT Store
    5. Replicate
    6. TensorFlow Hub
    7. PyTorch Hub

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named taranjeet/awesome-gpts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of taranjeet/awesome-gpts?
    pass
    AI named taranjeet/awesome-gpts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts taranjeet/awesome-gpts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named taranjeet/awesome-gpts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo taranjeet/awesome-gpts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name taranjeet/awesome-gpts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of taranjeet/awesome-gpts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/taranjeet/awesome-gpts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/taranjeet/awesome-gpts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/taranjeet/awesome-gpts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/taranjeet/awesome-gpts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

taranjeet/awesome-gpts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite