RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub

Default branch main · commit 40c75972 · scanned 6/9/2026, 5:01:59 AM

GitHub: 854 stars · 474 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clearly state its unique purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # llmx.txt hub

A comprehensive collection of llms.txt implementations and resources for LLM-powered tools and services.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # llms.txt Hub: The Central Directory for AI-Ready Documentation Standards

This repository is the definitive, largest directory for tools and documentation implementing the proposed `llms.txt` standard, guiding AI models on how to interact with your content.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a clear statement about the project's license to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License

This project is licensed under a custom agreement. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for complete terms and conditions.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add topics that reinforce the 'standard' and 'AI guidance' aspects

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cursor, cursor-ai, directory, llms, llms-txt, llmstxt, nextjs, robots-txt, supabase, supabase-auth, taiwindcss
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cursor, cursor-ai, directory, llms, llms-txt, llmstxt, nextjs, robots-txt, supabase, supabase-auth, taiwindcss, standard, specification, ai-guidance, llm-interaction, ai-ready-documentation

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitBook
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitBook · recommended 2×
  2. Read the Docs · recommended 1×
  3. Sphinx · recommended 1×
  4. MkDocs · recommended 1×
  5. Docusaurus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I standardize documentation access for AI models and LLM-powered tools?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Read the Docs
    2. Sphinx
    3. MkDocs
    4. Docusaurus
    5. Confluence
    6. GitBook
    7. OpenAPI Specification
    8. Swagger UI
    9. Jupyter Notebooks
    10. Google Colab
    11. nbdev
    12. Microsoft SharePoint
    13. Microsoft Teams Wiki

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a directory of tools for managing AI interaction with project documentation?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitBook
    2. Nuclia
    3. ReadMe
    4. Algolia
    5. Zendesk Guide
    6. Guru
    7. OpenAI API
    8. LangChain
    9. Hugging Face

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub?
    pass
    AI named thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

thedaviddias/llms-txt-hub — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite