RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

thu-coai/Safety-Prompts

Default branch main · commit bbfd3ce4 · scanned 5/27/2026, 6:32:51 PM

GitHub: 1,165 stars · 89 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface thu-coai/Safety-Prompts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the primary purpose of this repository in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Chinese safety prompts for evaluating and improving the safety of LLMs.
    
    中文安全prompts,用于评测和提升大模型的安全性,将模型的输出与人类的价值观对齐。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides a comprehensive dataset of Chinese safety prompts and LLM responses, primarily designed for training and fine-tuning safer large language models. 中文安全prompts数据集,主要用于训练和微调更安全的LLM。While originating from our safety evaluation research, for current model evaluation, please refer to our dedicated platforms like SafetyBench.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to datasets, benchmarks, and adversarial prompts

    Why:

    CURRENT
    attack-defense, chatgpt, chinese-language, instruction, llm, prompt, prompt-engineering, safety
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    attack-defense, adversarial-prompts, llm-safety-dataset, llm-benchmark, red-teaming, chatgpt, chinese-language, instruction, llm, prompt, prompt-engineering, safety
  • lowabout#3
    Update the repository description to reflect its primary use for training and fine-tuning

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Chinese safety prompts for evaluating and improving the safety of LLMs. 中文安全prompts,用于评估和提升大模型的安全性。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive dataset of Chinese safety prompts and LLM responses, primarily for training and fine-tuning safer large language models. 中文安全prompts数据集,主要用于训练和微调更安全的LLM。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface thu-coai/Safety-Prompts
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
RealToxicityPrompts
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. RealToxicityPrompts · recommended 2×
  2. Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
  3. BERT-base-chinese · recommended 1×
  4. RoBERTa-large-chinese · recommended 1×
  5. Baichuan2-7B-Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to evaluate and improve the safety of large language models for Chinese language applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    2. BERT-base-chinese
    3. RoBERTa-large-chinese
    4. Baichuan2-7B-Chat
    5. Qwen-7B-Chat
    6. RealToxicityPrompts
    7. BOLD
    8. TruthfulQA
    9. LM-Harness (EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)
    10. trl library
    11. OpenAI API
    12. GPT-4
    13. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    14. Content Moderation API
    15. Baidu ERNIE Bot API
    16. Alibaba Tongyi Qianwen API
    17. ERNIE Bot
    18. Tongyi Qianwen
    19. Label Studio
    20. Prodigy
    21. Microsoft's Guidance

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a dataset of adversarial prompts to test and fine-tune LLM safety.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AdvBench
    2. HarmBench
    3. Anthropic's Red Teaming Dataset
    4. RealToxicityPrompts
    5. Jailbreak Chat
    6. AdvGLUE

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of thu-coai/Safety-Prompts?
    pass
    AI named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts thu-coai/Safety-Prompts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo thu-coai/Safety-Prompts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name thu-coai/Safety-Prompts — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

thu-coai/Safety-Prompts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite