REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
thu-coai/Safety-Prompts
Default branch main · commit bbfd3ce4 · scanned 5/27/2026, 6:32:51 PM
GitHub: 1,165 stars · 89 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface thu-coai/Safety-Prompts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highreadme#1Clarify the primary purpose of this repository in the README's opening
Why:
CURRENTChinese safety prompts for evaluating and improving the safety of LLMs. 中文安全prompts,用于评测和提升大模型的安全性,将模型的输出与人类的价值观对齐。
COPY-PASTE FIXThis repository provides a comprehensive dataset of Chinese safety prompts and LLM responses, primarily designed for training and fine-tuning safer large language models. 中文安全prompts数据集,主要用于训练和微调更安全的LLM。While originating from our safety evaluation research, for current model evaluation, please refer to our dedicated platforms like SafetyBench.
- mediumtopics#2Add more specific topics related to datasets, benchmarks, and adversarial prompts
Why:
CURRENTattack-defense, chatgpt, chinese-language, instruction, llm, prompt, prompt-engineering, safety
COPY-PASTE FIXattack-defense, adversarial-prompts, llm-safety-dataset, llm-benchmark, red-teaming, chatgpt, chinese-language, instruction, llm, prompt, prompt-engineering, safety
- lowabout#3Update the repository description to reflect its primary use for training and fine-tuning
Why:
CURRENTChinese safety prompts for evaluating and improving the safety of LLMs. 中文安全prompts,用于评估和提升大模型的安全性。
COPY-PASTE FIXA comprehensive dataset of Chinese safety prompts and LLM responses, primarily for training and fine-tuning safer large language models. 中文安全prompts数据集,主要用于训练和微调更安全的LLM。
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- RealToxicityPrompts · recommended 2×
- Hugging Face Transformers Library · recommended 1×
- BERT-base-chinese · recommended 1×
- RoBERTa-large-chinese · recommended 1×
- Baichuan2-7B-Chat · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYHow to evaluate and improve the safety of large language models for Chinese language applications?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Hugging Face Transformers Library
- BERT-base-chinese
- RoBERTa-large-chinese
- Baichuan2-7B-Chat
- Qwen-7B-Chat
- RealToxicityPrompts
- BOLD
- TruthfulQA
- LM-Harness (EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness)
- trl library
- OpenAI API
- GPT-4
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- Content Moderation API
- Baidu ERNIE Bot API
- Alibaba Tongyi Qianwen API
- ERNIE Bot
- Tongyi Qianwen
- Label Studio
- Prodigy
- Microsoft's Guidance
AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYSeeking a dataset of adversarial prompts to test and fine-tune LLM safety.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- AdvBench
- HarmBench
- Anthropic's Red Teaming Dataset
- RealToxicityPrompts
- Jailbreak Chat
- AdvGLUE
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesspass
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of thu-coai/Safety-Prompts?passAI named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts thu-coai/Safety-Prompts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named thu-coai/Safety-Prompts explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo thu-coai/Safety-Prompts solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI did not name thu-coai/Safety-Prompts — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of thu-coai/Safety-Prompts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/thu-coai/Safety-Prompts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
thu-coai/Safety-Prompts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite