RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

thu-ml/SageAttention

Default branch main · commit d1a57a54 · scanned 5/30/2026, 5:38:00 AM

GitHub: 3,393 stars · 426 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface thu-ml/SageAttention, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 and opening paragraph to highlight core differentiator

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # SageAttention
    This repository provides the official implementation of SageAttention, SageAttention2, and SageAttention2++, which achieve surprising speedup on most GPUs without lossing accuracy across all models in a plug-and-play way.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # SageAttention: Quantized Attention for 2-5x Speedup over FlashAttention
    This repository provides the official implementation of SageAttention, SageAttention2, and SageAttention2++. It introduces novel quantized attention mechanisms that achieve a 2-5x speedup compared to FlashAttention, without losing end-to-end metrics across language, image, and video models, in a plug-and-play way.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps after 'Current Features', titled '## Comparison with FlashAttention and other Baselines' or similar, detailing the speedup and accuracy benefits.
  • lowabout#3
    Refine the 'about' description for clearer problem/solution framing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    [ICLR2025, ICML2025, NeurIPS2025 Spotlight] Quantized Attention achieves speedup of 2-5x compared to FlashAttention, without losing end-to-end metrics across language, image, and video models.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [ICLR2025, ICML2025, NeurIPS2025 Spotlight] Addressing the computational bottleneck of attention, SageAttention introduces novel quantized attention mechanisms that achieve 2-5x speedup over FlashAttention, maintaining end-to-end accuracy across language, image, and video models.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface thu-ml/SageAttention
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
FlashAttention
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. FlashAttention · recommended 1×
  2. xFormers · recommended 1×
  3. DeepSpeed · recommended 1×
  4. Triton · recommended 1×
  5. Longformer · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to achieve significant attention speedup for large models while maintaining end-to-end accuracy?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FlashAttention
    2. xFormers
    3. DeepSpeed
    4. Triton
    5. Longformer
    6. BigBird
    7. Reformer
    8. Multi-Query Attention (MQA)
    9. Grouped-Query Attention (GQA)
    10. Performer
    11. Linformer

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named thu-ml/SageAttention. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking plug-and-play quantized attention kernels for GPU inference acceleration in deep learning.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. NVIDIA FasterTransformer
    2. NVIDIA TensorRT
    3. ONNX Runtime
    4. Hugging Face Optimum
    5. Intel OpenVINO Toolkit
    6. PyTorch 2.x

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named thu-ml/SageAttention. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of thu-ml/SageAttention?
    pass
    AI did not name thu-ml/SageAttention — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts thu-ml/SageAttention in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named thu-ml/SageAttention explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo thu-ml/SageAttention solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named thu-ml/SageAttention explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of thu-ml/SageAttention. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/thu-ml/SageAttention.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-ml/SageAttention)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/thu-ml/SageAttention"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/thu-ml/SageAttention.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

thu-ml/SageAttention — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite